Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature/tit for tat agent strategy #2

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 8, 2022
Merged

Feature/tit for tat agent strategy #2

merged 9 commits into from
Aug 8, 2022

Conversation

zeyus
Copy link
Owner

@zeyus zeyus commented Aug 7, 2022

For discussion (GTFT?, distributions, weights etc).

@zeyus zeyus added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 7, 2022
@zeyus zeyus requested a review from Ewbew August 7, 2022 23:53
@zeyus zeyus self-assigned this Aug 7, 2022
@zeyus
Copy link
Owner Author

zeyus commented Aug 8, 2022 •
edited
Loading

~700,000 agents, no problems, could easily go higher.
screenshot

zeyus
zeyus commented Aug 8, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner Author

@zeyus zeyus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, even though I thought I'd fixed it, it seems the bug is back with multiple agents at the same location, investigating now:
image

Ewbew
Ewbew approved these changes Aug 8, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ewbew Ewbew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another good job well done

@zeyus zeyus merged commit 77b3218 into main Aug 8, 2022
@zeyus zeyus deleted the feature/tit_for_tat_agent_strategy branch August 8, 2022 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Ewbew Ewbew Ewbew approved these changes

Assignees

@zeyus zeyus

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@zeyus @Ewbew