Airtable #59
Merged
Airtable #59
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ss schema_provider tests
Idokah
force-pushed
the
airtable-refactoring
branch
2 times, most recently
from
32d0692 to
77e824e
Compare
|
about aggregation- they didn't expose MIN, MAX, etc. so it's problematic to implement aggregation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
app_data e2e pass (except aggregation),
app_schema e2e pass,
data_provider without aggregation and skip
schema_provider pass
db_operation with mock need to fix.
still need to refactor and go through it, so dont merge yet.