-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add confidenceMethod to table of reserved terms and v2 @context
#1142
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -3291,6 +3291,26 @@ <h3>Reserved Extension Points</h3> | |||||
</thead> | ||||||
|
||||||
<tbody> | ||||||
<tr> | ||||||
<td>`confidenceMethod`</td> | ||||||
<td> | ||||||
A property used for specifying one or more methods that a verifier | ||||||
might use to increase their confidence that the value of an attribute in or of | ||||||
a verifiable credential or verifiable presentation is accurate, including but not | ||||||
limited to attributes such `initialRecipient` (a/k/a `issuee`), `presenter`, | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I know I missed the merge. You can probably fix this with a direct commit, rather than going through all the PR hoops...
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for catching this. Fixed in cf429b1 |
||||||
`authorizedPresenter`, `holder`, etc. | ||||||
The associated vocabulary URL MUST be | ||||||
`https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#confidenceMethod`. | ||||||
<p class="issue" title="(AT RISK) Reservation depends on implementations"> | ||||||
This property reservation might be deleted in favor of an existing section | ||||||
in the specification if at least one specification with two independent | ||||||
implementations are demonstrated by the end of the Candidate Recommendation | ||||||
Phase. If that does not occur, this reservation will remain, but the existing | ||||||
section in the specification will be removed. | ||||||
See <a href="https://w3c-ccg.github.io/confidence-method-spec/">Verifiable Credential Confidence Methods</a>. | ||||||
</p> | ||||||
</td> | ||||||
</tr> | ||||||
<tr> | ||||||
<td>`evidence`</td> | ||||||
<td> | ||||||
|
@@ -3324,13 +3344,14 @@ <h3>Reserved Extension Points</h3> | |||||
<tr> | ||||||
<td>`renderMethod`</td> | ||||||
<td> | ||||||
A property used for specifying how to render a credential into a visual, | ||||||
A property used for specifying one or more methods to render a credential into a visual, | ||||||
auditory, or haptic format. The associated vocabulary URL MUST be | ||||||
`https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#renderMethod`. | ||||||
<p class="issue" title="(AT RISK) Reservation depends on implementations"> | ||||||
This reserved property is at risk and will be removed from the | ||||||
specification if at least one specification with two independent implementations | ||||||
are not demonstrated by the end of the Candidate Recommendation Phase. | ||||||
See <a href="https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vc-render-method/">Verifiable Credential Rendering Methods</a>. | ||||||
OR13 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||
</p> | ||||||
</td> | ||||||
</tr> | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be scoped to credentialSubject?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should either be globally scoped or use
"@propagate": true
, but, yes, making it a property on a VC only isn't correct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe
confidenceMethod
could be scoped to any property/ies. I don't understand what it would do forcredentialSubject
, nor what it does forVerifiableCredential
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the comments above, I don't think it should be scoped... However, if it should be scoped, there should be normative statements that people can read, before the context scoping is applied... and some human readable summary of why, here:
https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials#confidenceMethod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe https://w3id.org/security#confidenceMethod would be a better term definition, if the W3C CCG will define the behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By "scoped to any property/ies" above, I meant that this
confidenceMethod
should be applicable to any property+value pair (or group of same), something like