Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(warning): Add "symbol" and "boolean" for "key" warning #11436

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mpawelski
Copy link

Booleans as keys are supported since #6127 and symbols since #7271.
The warning should reflect that.
I created PR as suggested here. There is separat PR for docs

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe: changes warning text in devtools console

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

The PR fulfills these requirements:

If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:

  • A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

Other information:

@mpawelski mpawelski force-pushed the add-symbol-and-boolean-to-key-warning branch 2 times, most recently from 199cd33 to 5ac7f94 Compare June 4, 2020 23:21
Booleans as keys are supported since vuejs#6127 and symbols since vuejs#7271.
The warning should reflect that.
@mpawelski mpawelski force-pushed the add-symbol-and-boolean-to-key-warning branch from 5ac7f94 to 94060b2 Compare June 4, 2020 23:23
@posva posva added the warnings related to development warnings label Jun 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
warnings related to development warnings
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants