Modify the license to upload to crates.io.

[Shylock-Hg]

See rust-lang/cargo#2174 (comment) for crates.io now try check the license by spdx, and spdx not introduce the common clause in spdx/license-list-XML#902

[darionyaphet]

Is it need to be consistent with the main repo ?

[Shylock-Hg]

Is it need to be consistent with the main repo ?

In my think, the client don't need the cc license. CC is used to prevent SasS provider, the client has no this issue.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[visortelle]

Any news on this PR?

[Shylock-Hg]

Any news on this PR?

Our reviewer don't agree to.

[visortelle]

But you need to make some decision on it anyway. 🙂

I'll provide some options I found:

SPDX LienseRef with a custom license

Consider SPDX LicenseRef.

This section is used for any detected, declared, or concluded licenses that are NOT on the SPDX License List.

It will look something like LicenseRef-Nebula-Graph-1.0.

Additionally use license-file Cargo.toml field.

Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

MongoDB and Elasticsearch use this license.

It's a valid SPDX license: https://spdx.org/licenses/SSPL-1.0.html

https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/blob/master/LICENSE-Community.txt

Business Source License 1.1 (BSL)

https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/blob/master/LICENSE

It's a valid SPDX license: https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html

---

As both mentioned licenses are valid SPDX licenses, you should be able to combine any of them with Apache-2.0 as it has done here: https://github.com/kubo/rust-oracle/blob/7832f993c207904dcca0186f3fb8cac75404c508/Cargo.toml#L7

---

I also don't see any sense in the proprietary license for the database client code. @laura-ding did you ever saw such examples? Maybe I'm missing something.

Thank you.

[Shylock-Hg]

But you need to make some decision on it anyway. 🙂

I'll provide some options I found:

SPDX LienseRef with a custom license

Consider SPDX LicenseRef.

This section is used for any detected, declared, or concluded licenses that are NOT on the SPDX License List.

It will look something like LicenseRef-Nebula-Graph-1.0.

Additionally use license-file Cargo.toml field.

Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

MongoDB and Elasticsearch use this license.

It's a valid SPDX license: https://spdx.org/licenses/SSPL-1.0.html

https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/blob/master/LICENSE-Community.txt

Business Source License 1.1 (BSL)

https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/blob/master/LICENSE

It's a valid SPDX license: https://spdx.org/licenses/BUSL-1.1.html

As both mentioned licenses are valid SPDX licenses, you should be able to combine any of them with Apache-2.0 as it has done here: https://github.com/kubo/rust-oracle/blob/7832f993c207904dcca0186f3fb8cac75404c508/Cargo.toml#L7

I also don't see any sense in the proprietary license for the database client code. @laura-ding did you ever saw such examples? Maybe I'm missing something.

Thank you.

Yes, thanks for suggestion. My member prefer to let user include the source directly instead of add as library. And I will try to push this PR before this client release.

[wey-gu]

@Shylock-Hg as we changed to apache 2.0(removing cc), thus it's good to go with SPDX, right? :D

[Shylock-Hg]

@Shylock-Hg as we changed to apache 2.0(removing cc), thus it's good to go with SPDX, right? :D

Yes

[Sophie-Xie]

Too long, close it.