You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm just wondering if it would be possible to add the split.by function to CoveragePlot() and PlotFootprint() (there are probably a few others that it would be useful on, but those are the main ones I can think of off the top of my head).
I think it would be useful where users might have multiple samples, so you could have the plots set to group.by the cluster identities and then a separate plot for each sample to make comparing side-by-side a bit easier. I know you can append the name of the sample to the identity to separate them all out individually, but for example if I have a set of 4 samples each with 17 cell types it becomes a lot to look at.
Or if there are any other suggestions for how to achieve something similar I'm open to them too.
Thanks,
Ciarán
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
I'm just wondering if it would be possible to add the split.by function to CoveragePlot() and PlotFootprint() (there are probably a few others that it would be useful on, but those are the main ones I can think of off the top of my head).
I think it would be useful where users might have multiple samples, so you could have the plots set to group.by the cluster identities and then a separate plot for each sample to make comparing side-by-side a bit easier. I know you can append the name of the sample to the identity to separate them all out individually, but for example if I have a set of 4 samples each with 17 cell types it becomes a lot to look at.
Or if there are any other suggestions for how to achieve something similar I'm open to them too.
Thanks,
Ciarán
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: