-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typing client file #384
Typing client file #384
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #384 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 87.46% 87.64% +0.18%
==========================================
Files 10 10
Lines 1651 1668 +17
Branches 149 148 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 1444 1462 +18
Misses 167 167
+ Partials 40 39 -1
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Back from summer holiday! Just finished typing the client file. Sorry for the big diff but at least after that we will have most of the outward facing method typed I think. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot for this PR! Before merging, I'd like to be sure we're not changing any behavior regarding the before
and after
parameters I mentioned in a specific comment.
I think it is now ready to go 💯 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks for the explanations and fixes!
* Type signature of all client method * finish typing all signature in client file * minor fixes * finish typing client * fix stream default param * update changelog * use after_epoch and before_epoch in param dict * minor change in BatchedIterator type annotation --------- Co-authored-by: Jonatan Samoocha <[email protected]>
Description
Add type annotations to the client file. See #373
Still need to fix a couple small typing error and would be best to address #383
first as it relates to the test that are now failling.
Type of change
Select the statement best describes this pull request.
Does your PR include tests
If you are fixing a bug or adding a feature, we appreciate (but do not require)
tests to support whatever fix of feature you're implementing.
Did you include your contribution to the change log?
changelog.md
is up-to-date.If you are having a hard time getting the tests to run correctly feel free to
ping one of the maintainers here!