-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add site to powerset during merge #75
Conversation
Forgot I hadn't cut over all the test data, which i'll do seperately to spare your eyes: #76 |
site = s3_key_array[0] | ||
site = s3_key_array[3] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this intentional - it feels different than the rest.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it was - this was accidentally pulling in the bucket name rather than the site in question.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Were we missing a test that would have caught that? Should we add one that would now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably - this is sort of related to #71 but i could do some of that as part of this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well that was a good call - there were some logical errors in the S3 mock that I wasn't catching.
This PR makes the following changes: