Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hide-view-call-activity #1972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

hide-view-call-activity #1972

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

jasquat
Copy link
Contributor

@jasquat jasquat commented Jul 22, 2024

Fixes #1963

This hides the "View Call Activity Diagram" link from CallActivity tasks in a future type state. This is because while in that type of state the CallActivity has not created its subprocess task instances and therefore there is nothing to actually view and it errors.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Improved logic for displaying task data based on refined conditions for task states and types.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced control flow to prevent processing of certain tasks under specific states.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes to the ProcessInstanceShow component improve the logic for displaying task data by refining state checks and enhancing control flow based on task types. This results in clearer, more maintainable code, ensuring that tasks are only processed under relevant conditions, thereby enhancing user experience and system reliability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
spiffworkflow-frontend/src/routes/ProcessInstanceShow.tsx Improved readability by using the includes method for task state checks. Added conditions to refine task processing based on types and states.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Call Activity Instance diagram related error (#1963) It's unclear whether the changes directly address the error message when a Call Activity is not started. Further clarification is needed on error handling.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4e0386 and ba87c9a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • spiffworkflow-frontend/src/routes/ProcessInstanceShow.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
spiffworkflow-frontend/src/routes/ProcessInstanceShow.tsx (3)
Learnt from: jasquat
PR: sartography/spiff-arena#1902
File: spiffworkflow-frontend/src/routes/ProcessInstanceMigratePage.tsx:353-353
Timestamp: 2024-07-11T14:30:49.271Z
Learning: Verify code changes using shell scripts when the user indicates a modification has been made.
Learnt from: jasquat
PR: sartography/spiff-arena#919
File: spiffworkflow-frontend/src/components/ProcessInstanceListTable.tsx:130-181
Timestamp: 2024-01-26T16:06:18.478Z
Learning: The user, jasquat, has indicated a consideration for future refactor regarding the suggestion to abstract the API call logic in `getProcessInstances` function into a separate service or hook for improved modularity and reusability.
Learnt from: jasquat
PR: sartography/spiff-arena#919
File: spiffworkflow-frontend/src/components/ProcessInstanceListTable.tsx:108-228
Timestamp: 2024-01-26T16:31:45.083Z
Learning: The user, jasquat, has indicated a consideration for future refactor regarding the suggestion to abstract the API call logic in `getProcessInstances` function into a separate service or hook for improved modularity and reusability.
Additional comments not posted (2)
spiffworkflow-frontend/src/routes/ProcessInstanceShow.tsx (2)

738-738: Improved readability and maintainability.

Using the includes method on an array to check the task state improves readability and maintainability.


1128-1131: Refined control flow for task type handling.

The additional condition ensures that only relevant tasks are handled, improving the control flow.

However, ensure that all function calls to taskDisplayButtons match the new logic.

@jasquat jasquat merged commit b4e9dff into main Jul 22, 2024
24 checks passed
@jasquat jasquat deleted the hide-view-call-activity branch July 22, 2024 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Call Activity Instance diagram related error
2 participants