Skip to content

remove bogus assertion and comments #47495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2018

Conversation

nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.

Fixes #47153

r? @pnkfelix

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.
@kennytm kennytm added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 17, 2018
Copy link
Member

@pnkfelix pnkfelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bors r+

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors p=1

Major blocker for NLL

@MaloJaffre
Copy link
Contributor

@pnkfelix Bors seems not to have reacted to the r+.

@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

@bors r=pnkfelix

Might not see review comments?

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

📌 Commit 3b390e5 has been approved by pnkfelix

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 3b390e5 with merge b85aefb...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2018
remove bogus assertion and comments

The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.

Fixes #47153

r? @pnkfelix
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 21, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: pnkfelix
Pushing b85aefb to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3b390e5 into rust-lang:master Jan 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants