Fix post-merge workflow #138335
Merged
Fix post-merge workflow #138335
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The command is called `post-merge-report` not `post-merge-analysis`.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
jieyouxu
added
T-infra
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
Thanks, you beat me to it. This was embarassing 🤦 |
|
Happens 😁 |
Kobzol
added a commit
to Kobzol/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Fix post-merge workflow The command is called `post-merge-report` not `post-merge-analysis`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/90384941aae4ea38de00e4702b50757e9b882a19/src/ci/citool/src/main.rs#L379 Noticed it failing in rust-lang#138310 (comment). r? `@Kobzol` (or `@marcoieni)`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#135987 (Clarify iterator by_ref docs) - rust-lang#137967 ([AIX] Fix hangs during testing) - rust-lang#138063 (Improve `-Zunpretty=hir` for parsed attrs) - rust-lang#138147 (Add maintainers for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) - rust-lang#138288 (Document -Z crate-attr) - rust-lang#138300 (add tracking issue for unqualified_local_imports) - rust-lang#138307 (Allow specifying glob patterns for try jobs) - rust-lang#138315 (use next_back() instead of last() on DoubleEndedIterator) - rust-lang#138330 (Remove unnecessary `[lints.rust]` sections.) - rust-lang#138335 (Fix post-merge workflow) - rust-lang#138343 (Enable `f16` tests for `powf`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#135987 (Clarify iterator by_ref docs) - rust-lang#137967 ([AIX] Fix hangs during testing) - rust-lang#138063 (Improve `-Zunpretty=hir` for parsed attrs) - rust-lang#138147 (Add maintainers for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu) - rust-lang#138288 (Document -Z crate-attr) - rust-lang#138300 (add tracking issue for unqualified_local_imports) - rust-lang#138307 (Allow specifying glob patterns for try jobs) - rust-lang#138315 (use next_back() instead of last() on DoubleEndedIterator) - rust-lang#138330 (Remove unnecessary `[lints.rust]` sections.) - rust-lang#138335 (Fix post-merge workflow) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138335 - jieyouxu:fix-citool, r=marcoieni Fix post-merge workflow The command is called `post-merge-report` not `post-merge-analysis`. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/90384941aae4ea38de00e4702b50757e9b882a19/src/ci/citool/src/main.rs#L379 Noticed it failing in rust-lang#138310 (comment). r? ``@Kobzol`` (or ``@marcoieni)``
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The command is called
post-merge-reportnotpost-merge-analysis. Seerust/src/ci/citool/src/main.rs
Line 379 in 9038494
Noticed it failing in #138310 (comment).
r? @Kobzol (or @marcoieni)