Skip to content

fix: Don't overwrite RUSTUP_TOOLCHAIN if it is already set #19807

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025

Conversation

Veykril
Copy link
Member

@Veykril Veykril commented May 16, 2025

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 16, 2025
@Veykril
Copy link
Member Author

Veykril commented May 16, 2025

cc @weihanglo, this might help with your setup slightly as discussed. Either way this seems like the right behavior for rust-analyzer here

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! This looks the correct behavior regardless it fixes issues in our environment or not.

Do you want me to first test against our environment before proceeding?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to, but you can of course test it and report back either way.

@Veykril Veykril added this pull request to the merge queue May 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 0843d06 May 16, 2025
14 checks passed
@Veykril Veykril deleted the lw-qyynkqysuyuy branch May 16, 2025 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants