Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[iOS] Bump up the cocoapods version #41895

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

xta0
Copy link
Contributor

@xta0 xta0 commented Jul 23, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

Summary

The iOS binary for 1.6.0 has been uploaded to AWS. This PR bumps up the version for cocoapods.

Test Plan

  • Check CI

Differential Revision: D22683787

xta0 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2020
ghstack-source-id: d5fa787abf47354be099aecd61c01e98d20a424e
Pull Request resolved: #41895
@xta0 xta0 requested review from husthyc and dreiss July 23, 2020 01:10
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 11caa92 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/1 failures introduced in this PR

🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patterns

The following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages:

See CircleCI build pytorch_macos_10_13_py3_test (1/1)

Step: "Test" (full log | diagnosis details | 🔁 rerun)

Jul 22 19:42:25 test_udf_remote_message_delay_timeout_to_self (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... [E request_callback_no_python.cpp:618] Received error while processing request type 5: false INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at "../torch/csrc/distributed/rpc/rref_context.cpp":379, please report a bug to PyTorch. Expected OwnerRRef with id GloballyUniqueId(created_on=0, local_id=0) to be created.
Jul 22 19:41:47 frame #10: std::__1::__thread_proxy<std::__1::tuple<std::__1::unique_ptr<std::__1::__thread_struct, std::__1::default_delete<std::__1::__thread_struct> >, c10::ThreadPool::ThreadPool(int, int, std::__1::function<void ()>)::$_0> >(void*, void*) + 67 (0x10ea5bd93 in libc10.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:41:47 frame #11: _pthread_body + 340 (0x7fff639496c1 in libsystem_pthread.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:41:47 frame #12: _pthread_body + 0 (0x7fff6394956d in libsystem_pthread.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:41:47 frame #13: thread_start + 13 (0x7fff63948c5d in libsystem_pthread.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:41:47  
Jul 22 19:41:47 ok (3.363s) 
Jul 22 19:42:02   test_rpc_builtin_timeout (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... ok (15.073s) 
Jul 22 19:42:11   test_rpc_script_timeout (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... ok (8.901s) 
Jul 22 19:42:14   test_rref_to_here_timeout (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... ok (3.374s) 
Jul 22 19:42:22   test_udf_remote_message_delay_timeout (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... ok (7.421s) 
Jul 22 19:42:25   test_udf_remote_message_delay_timeout_to_self (__main__.FaultyAgentRpcTestWithSpawn) ... [E request_callback_no_python.cpp:618] Received error while processing request type 5: false INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at "../torch/csrc/distributed/rpc/rref_context.cpp":379, please report a bug to PyTorch. Expected OwnerRRef with id GloballyUniqueId(created_on=0, local_id=0) to be created. 
Jul 22 19:42:25 Exception raised from getOwnerRRef at ../torch/csrc/distributed/rpc/rref_context.cpp:379 (most recent call first): 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #0: c10::Error::Error(c10::SourceLocation, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >) + 169 (0x11009a799 in libc10.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #1: torch::distributed::rpc::RRefContext::getOwnerRRef(torch::distributed::rpc::GloballyUniqueId const&, bool) + 1317 (0x118640d35 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #2: torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackImpl::processPythonRemoteCall(torch::distributed::rpc::RpcCommandBase&, std::__1::function<void (torch::distributed::rpc::Message)> const&, long long, std::__1::shared_ptr<torch::utils::Future<torch::distributed::rpc::Message> > const&) const + 136 (0x10f758628 in libtorch_python.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #3: torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackNoPython::processRpc(torch::distributed::rpc::RpcCommandBase&, torch::distributed::rpc::MessageType const&, long long, std::__1::shared_ptr<torch::utils::Future<torch::distributed::rpc::Message> > const&) const + 3638 (0x118631056 in libtorch_cpu.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #4: torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackImpl::processRpcWithErrors(torch::distributed::rpc::RpcCommandBase&, torch::distributed::rpc::MessageType const&, long long, std::__1::shared_ptr<torch::utils::Future<torch::distributed::rpc::Message> > const&) const + 37 (0x10f75aee5 in libtorch_python.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #5: std::__1::__function::__func<torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackNoPython::processMessage(torch::distributed::rpc::Message&) const::$_1, std::__1::allocator<torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackNoPython::processMessage(torch::distributed::rpc::Message&) const::$_1>, void ()>::operator()() + 175 (0x1186369ff in libtorch_cpu.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #6: torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallbackNoPython::processMessage(torch::distributed::rpc::Message&) const + 557 (0x11862f98d in libtorch_cpu.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #7: torch::distributed::rpc::RequestCallback::operator()(torch::distributed::rpc::Message&) const + 15 (0x11862f5bf in libtorch_cpu.dylib) 
Jul 22 19:42:25 frame #8: torch::distributed::rpc::ProcessGroupAgent::handleRecv(torch::distributed::rpc::RecvWork&) + 173 (0x10f73310d in libtorch_python.dylib) 

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 1 time.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@xta0 merged this pull request in 0ec7ba4.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/xta0/54/head branch July 26, 2020 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants