Skip to content

[1.16 regression] determining exhaustive match on an enum with type members #19151

Closed
@delfick

Description

@delfick

Hi,

I continued looking at how the codebase I work on responds to the upcoming mypy 1.16 release and I believe I found another bug

import datetime
import enum
from typing import assert_never


class ValueType(enum.Enum):
    BOOLEAN = bool
    DATE = datetime.date
    DATETIME = datetime.datetime


value_type: ValueType = ValueType.BOOLEAN

match value_type:
    case ValueType.BOOLEAN:
        pass
    case ValueType.DATE:
        pass
    case ValueType.DATETIME:
        pass
    case _:
        assert_never(value_type)

On mypy 1.16 I get this error

a.py:22: error: Argument 1 to "assert_never" has incompatible type "ValueType"; expected "Never"  [arg-type]

As far as I can tell this should be correct and I'm unsure why it doesn't think I have an exhaustive match.

Your Environment

  • Mypy version used: release-1.16 (revision 96525a2, built locally with mypy_mypyc-wheels for cp312-macosx_arm64)
  • Mypy command-line flags: mypy a.py
  • Mypy configuration options from mypy.ini (and other config files): no config
  • Python version used: python3.12

Activity

changed the title [-]Regression in upcoming mypy 1.16[/-] [+]Regression in upcoming mypy 1.16 - determining exhaustive match on an enum[/+] on May 26, 2025
hauntsaninja

hauntsaninja commented on May 26, 2025

@hauntsaninja
Collaborator

Thanks for testing pre-release. Bisects to #18675 cc @sobolevn

vidhyavijayan3

vidhyavijayan3 commented on May 27, 2025

@vidhyavijayan3

Hi @delfick @hauntsaninja

Can I work on this issue ?

hauntsaninja

hauntsaninja commented on May 27, 2025

@hauntsaninja
Collaborator

Sure, please do. In general, don't need to ask, just put up PRs!

Obviously most principled thing to do is understand what enum actually does at runtime to differentiate the lambda case #18675 was thinking about. An ad hoc thing could be to special case type object function likes

vidhyavijayan3

vidhyavijayan3 commented on May 27, 2025

@vidhyavijayan3

Thanks for the go-ahead, @hauntsaninja! I’ll start digging into the issue and put up a PR as soon as I have a fix. I’ll also take a closer look at how enums behave at runtime to make sure the solution is solid. Appreciate the guidance!

erictraut

erictraut commented on May 27, 2025

@erictraut

@vidhyavijayan3, there's one gotcha to keep in mind when you implement this. In general, enum types can be expanded into their individual literal member types. For example, the type ValueType is equivalent to Literal[ValueType.BOOLEAN, ValueType.DATE, ValueType.DATETIME] in the code sample above. This equivalency allows you to eliminate subtypes from the literal union based on pattern matches. However, this expansion doesn't work for classes that derive from enum.Flag, so this needs to be special-cased. For more details, refer to this section of the typing spec.

vidhyavijayan3

vidhyavijayan3 commented on May 27, 2025

@vidhyavijayan3

Thank you very much @erictraut for pointing that out. I understand the difference between enum and enum.Flag and the need to handle enum.Flag as a special case. I will review the relevant section of the typing specification to ensure I fully grasp the details before implementing the fix. I appreciate your helpful guidance!

delfick

delfick commented on May 28, 2025

@delfick
Author
hauntsaninja

hauntsaninja commented on May 28, 2025

@hauntsaninja
Collaborator

Hmm that one bisects to #18972 , opened a new issue at #19159 for that!

changed the title [-]Regression in upcoming mypy 1.16 - determining exhaustive match on an enum[/-] [+][1.16 regression] determining exhaustive match on an enum with type members[/+] on May 28, 2025
added a commit that references this issue on May 28, 2025
653a80c

7 remaining items

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @delfick@erictraut@hauntsaninja@sterliakov@vidhyavijayan3

      Issue actions

        [1.16 regression] determining exhaustive match on an enum with type members · Issue #19151 · python/mypy