Skip to content

Refactor asyncio.wait_for() #31847

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
59 changes: 5 additions & 54 deletions Lib/asyncio/tasks.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
from . import events
from . import exceptions
from . import futures
from . import timeouts
from .coroutines import _is_coroutine

# Helper to generate new task names
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -442,62 +443,12 @@ async def wait_for(fut, timeout):

This function is a coroutine.
"""
loop = events.get_running_loop()

if timeout is None:
return await fut

if timeout <= 0:
fut = ensure_future(fut, loop=loop)

if fut.done():
return fut.result()

await _cancel_and_wait(fut, loop=loop)
try:
return fut.result()
except exceptions.CancelledError as exc:
raise exceptions.TimeoutError() from exc

waiter = loop.create_future()
timeout_handle = loop.call_later(timeout, _release_waiter, waiter)
cb = functools.partial(_release_waiter, waiter)

fut = ensure_future(fut, loop=loop)
fut.add_done_callback(cb)
async def inner():
Copy link
Contributor

@graingert graingert Jul 20, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@asvetlov I've been having a go at this branch in bf594bd

you need to special case None in asyncio.wait_for(

Suggested change
async def inner():
if timeout is None:
return await fut
async def inner():

and then special case 0 in timeouts.timeout see https://gist.github.com/graingert/ea2546b23b32be5a4493a9a115db2eff#file-timeout_bug-py-L6

async with timeouts.timeout(timeout):
return await fut

try:
# wait until the future completes or the timeout
try:
await waiter
except exceptions.CancelledError:
if fut.done():
return fut.result()
else:
fut.remove_done_callback(cb)
# We must ensure that the task is not running
# after wait_for() returns.
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue32751
await _cancel_and_wait(fut, loop=loop)
raise

if fut.done():
return fut.result()
else:
fut.remove_done_callback(cb)
# We must ensure that the task is not running
# after wait_for() returns.
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue32751
await _cancel_and_wait(fut, loop=loop)
# In case task cancellation failed with some
# exception, we should re-raise it
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue40607
try:
return fut.result()
except exceptions.CancelledError as exc:
raise exceptions.TimeoutError() from exc
finally:
timeout_handle.cancel()
return await create_task(inner())
Copy link
Contributor

@graingert graingert Jul 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this extra create_task is worth it, the tests it passes are equivalent to:

async def wait_for(fut, delay):
    if delay is None:
        return await fut
    if delay <= 0:
        if asyncio.iscoroutine(fut):
            fut.close()
            raise TimeoutError

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to skip this create_task and delete the tests that fail



async def _wait(fs, timeout, return_when, loop):
Expand Down