fix the description of validation "RegistryV1" format

[dongwenjuan]

Signed-off-by: dongwenjuan [email protected]

Description of the change:

Motivation for the change:

Reviewer Checklist

• Implementation matches the proposed design, or proposal is updated to match implementation
• Sufficient unit test coverage
• Sufficient end-to-end test coverage
• Docs updated or added to /docs
• Commit messages sensible and descriptive

[openshift-ci-robot]

Hi @dongwenjuan. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a operator-framework member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ankitathomas]

/ok-to-test

[dongwenjuan]

/assign @ankitathomas

[njhale]

@dongwenjuan we appreciate you taking the time to make this change, but for future reference, we typically hold off on including such small doc/style changes until we have a more substantive patch that we can include them in.

/lgtm
/approve

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dongwenjuan, njhale

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [njhale]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[dongwenjuan]

@dongwenjuan we appreciate you taking the time to make this change, but for future reference, we typically hold off on including such small doc/style changes until we have a more substantive patch that we can include them in.

/lgtm
/approve

OK, thanks~

[njhale]

Docs only, bypassing infra issues for this one.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

[openshift-ci-robot]

@njhale: Overrode contexts on behalf of njhale: ci/prow/e2e-aws

In response to this:

Docs only, bypassing infra issues for this one.

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.