Skip to content

Issue Triage Role #370

Open
Open
@awgreene

Description

@awgreene

I was speaking with @joelanford, @ncdc and @oceanc80 and we got on the topic of Issue Triaging. The weekly meeting is called OLM WG and Issue Triage Meeting and we haven't done much issue triaging.

Our discussion focused on a few points:

  • There is a general sentiment that in person issue triaging isn’t very effective
  • We think that it would benefit the community if we embraced closing issues asynchronously.
  • There is a concern that if “everyone is responsible for triaging issues asynchronously, no one will close issues asynchronously”.

The goal of this thread is to identify how we'd like to triage issues as a community and decide how this might impact our "OLM WG and Issue Triage Meeting"

Originally posted by @awgreene in #335 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions