Always use " = " separator for module type definitions #344
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
greedy
force-pushed
the
fix-module-type-defn-syntax
branch
from
4376bc7 to
60adddd
Compare
All cases of module type definitions in both OCaml and Reason use an equal sign to separate the identifier from the definitions.
greedy
force-pushed
the
fix-module-type-defn-syntax
branch
from
60adddd to
b4fd4af
Compare
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All cases of module type definitions in both OCaml and Reason use an
equal sign to separate the identifier from the definitions.