-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.4k
feat(blog): pride #7888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(blog): pride #7888
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Carl Vitullo <[email protected]>
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds a new blog post for Pride 2025, presenting a personal narrative on open-sourced identity and how evolving labels reflect personal and professional growth.
- Introduces a new Markdown file for the 2025 Pride post
- Provides thoughtful content linking change in coding practices to personal identity
@nodejs/tsc @nodejs/marketing |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carl Vitullo <[email protected]>
As a reminder to organization members, adding a pride blog post(s) was voted for in the leading candidate during the organization-wide vote we recently held. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7888 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.49% 75.47% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 101 101
Lines 8311 8311
Branches 218 218
==========================================
- Hits 6274 6273 -1
- Misses 2035 2036 +1
Partials 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This is beautifully written; thanks @vcarl! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding of the blog post idea (from @benjamingr if I recall correctly) was quite different. The idea of the blog post series to highlight the technical contributions done by LGBTQ+ people, showing how much they made a difference to the project.
While I like this specific blog post, I don’t think it fits our blog.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LOVE it
"Publish a series of blog posts outlining contributions from voluntary LGBT+ contributors." One could argue that contributing a blog post itself is a voluntary contribution. Additionally, this blog post features a quote from npm's co-founder, whose contributions to the ecosystem have been immense. One could also point out that a blog post like this will inspire more LGBTQ contributors to contribute to the project, perhaps we can mention in the blog post that we are looking for LGBTQ contributors to write posts, and this will act as an introduction to the series? |
> | ||
> We need to be sure you know you're not alone. | ||
|
||
Happy Pride. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we mention that we are looking for LGBTQ contributors to publish blog posts outlining their contributions. We can use this post as an introduction to the initiative.
On that note, if we change this blog post to include the additional information, it's canonically different than the one linked, so that can be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, happy to add something but not sure precisely what the plan for a subsequent series is so I'm not sure what copy would be best to add. Won't fight too hard on canonical rel, but it would be neato to get a backlink of some variety for whatever SEO juice that contains 😇 but that's not the point of this, not highly important to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 to what Aviv said. With the new addition, if this blog helps in encouraging LGBTQ contributors to participate in sharing about their Node.js contributions that they'd like to see outlined, that's good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vcarl Perhaps something like
"As part of Pride Month, we’re launching a series of blog posts highlighting the voices and work of LGBTQ technologists. If you identify as part of the community and want to share your journey, your projects, or how your identity has shaped your perspective and contributions, we’d love to hear from you. Reach out and help us celebrate the diversity, creativity, and brilliance that make our field stronger."
(Obviously, you can workshop it however you'd like)
About the canonical link — I strongly recommend we remove it. This article includes additional content, making it meaningfully different from the original. If we set the canonical to your site, search engines may not index our version, which would reduce its visibility.
While Carl may not be a core contributor to the code powering Node.js, they absolutely have contributed to Node.js as a whole, most recently with the launch of our official Discord server, which is definitely making a difference to the project by giving the community a new space to engage. |
FWIW, this style of post was exactly the kind of post I was envisioning |
Adding to the agenda for @nodejs/tsc visibility, feel free to remove after the meeting today. |
Missed the cutoff, sorry. |
@nodejs/TSC I would love if this was merged before July, as to make it merged during Pride Month, so please review when you get a chance. @mcollina Given the additional comments, would you mind taking a second look 🙏? Thank you all! |
Description
Add a blog post for Pride 2025 ✨
Validation
Yes, please
Related Issues
n/a
Check List
pnpm format
to ensure the code follows the style guide.pnpm test
to check if all tests are passing.pnpm build
to check if the website builds without errors.