Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set zero gc period for test_ondemand_download_large_rel as intended #3985

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

LizardWizzard
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like it is the source of flakiness in this test.

Reuse some config parts across tests.

tenant, _ = env.neon_cli.create_tenant(
conf={
# disable background GC
"gc_period": "10 m",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main change that this now become 0

@LizardWizzard

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2023

Test results for c883d85:


debug build: 212 tests run: 202 passed, 0 failed, 10 (full report)


release build: 212 tests run: 202 passed, 0 failed, 10 (full report)


@LizardWizzard LizardWizzard force-pushed the dkr/truly-disable-gc branch from 1f15d40 to c883d85 Compare April 7, 2023 17:04
@LizardWizzard LizardWizzard marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2023 17:49
@LizardWizzard LizardWizzard requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2023 17:49
@LizardWizzard LizardWizzard requested review from save-buffer and removed request for a team April 7, 2023 17:49
@koivunej
Copy link
Member

koivunej commented Apr 7, 2023

I think I have a draft pr wrt this test and I think I found this is not enough. #3697.

@koivunej
Copy link
Member

koivunej commented Apr 7, 2023

Also, are the submodule changes intended or by mistake?

@LizardWizzard
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I have a draft pr wrt this test and I think I found this is not enough. #3697.

Oh, I havent seen this one, I'll close this one then.

I was also thinking about merging configs for different tests because they are quite similar.

Also, are the submodule changes intended or by mistake?

Yep, this is not intended, was checking out back and forth and forgot to update submodules

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants