We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we used flat url structure - http://www.mydev.my/cara-murah-guna-https.html
What about http://www.mydev.my/posts/2015/01/20/cara-murah-guna-https.html ?
Maybe we should look from SEO perspective, which one is better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Default Jekyll config is using having date in the URL. I changed it to simple filename path so old link from the Pelican version wont break.
Personally, I don't see much benefit in it unless for personal blogs which chronological timeline might bring some context to the article.
I am not sure about SEO though.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:40 PM, k4ml [email protected] wrote:
Currently we used flat url structure - http://www.mydev.my/cara-murah-guna-https.html What about http://www.mydev.my/posts/2015/01/20/cara-murah-guna-https.html ? Maybe we should look from SEO perspective, which one is better. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #4.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #4.
Sorry, something went wrong.
You have a point there. As for SEO, adding category is better I think - http://www.mydev.my/javascript/belajar-javascript-bhg-2.html will optimize that for javascript keyword.
No branches or pull requests
Currently we used flat url structure - http://www.mydev.my/cara-murah-guna-https.html
What about http://www.mydev.my/posts/2015/01/20/cara-murah-guna-https.html ?
Maybe we should look from SEO perspective, which one is better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: