[CIR] Fix Address element type problems #1373
Merged
+91
−60
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were problems with the pointer type and element type of the Address class getting out of sync. In the traditional codegen the pointer has no type, so it was sufficient for the Address class to simply track the type it was supposed to be pointing to. Since ClangIR pointer values are typed, the Address::withType function wasn't really doing what it was supposed to. It returned an object with the same pointer that the original object had, but with a mismatched element type.
This change updates the Address::withType function to perform a bitcast to get the expected pointer type before creating a new Address object. It also adds assertions in the Address class to verify that pointer type and element type are consistent and updates many places that were causing those assertions to fire.
These code changes cause extra bitcasts to be emitted in a few places. Regression tests have been updated as needed to reflect the CIR that is now generated.