-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base-noprelude is so 8.8.4 #396
Comments
So I'm okay with adding a small documentation note to the README and Ideally, someone else motivated enough could take take the maintenance of |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Moving a project to ``relude`` it took a while before I realised that base-noprelude was preventing cabal from building. Until such time as base-noprelude is being actively maintained I think there should be a warning against its use. Also removed stay bullet point next to video. partly addresses kowainik#396 => kowainik#396 (comment)
It doesn't seem sustainable for Could we merge #435 or remove the doc section completely until a viable path for the library is found? (I was setting up Stack with Relude today on GHC 9.4.6 and started setting up using this method before realising |
Moving a project to ``relude`` it took a while before I realised that base-noprelude was preventing cabal from building. Until such time as base-noprelude is being actively maintained I think there should be a warning against its use. Also removed stay bullet point next to video. partly addresses #396 => #396 (comment)
Seems like in a while it would be reasonable to remove documentation on it, or mark/refer/remind about it as a former option for legacy GHC versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: