-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
refactor(frontend)/nextjs migration #45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on updating dependency versions in the project's Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-website-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/package.json
(1 hunks)package.json
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/package.json (3)
18-18
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify Next.js version compatibility
The specified version
^15.1.4
appears incorrect as Next.js 15 has not been officially released yet. The latest stable version is 14.x.Recommend downgrading to the latest stable 14.x version:
- "next": "^15.1.4", + "next": "^14.1.0",✅ Verification successful
Next.js version 15.1.4 is correct
The specified version matches the latest stable release from the npm registry. No changes needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify latest Next.js version curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/next/latest | jq -r '.version'Length of output: 72
19-20
:⚠️ Potential issueCritical: React 19 is not officially released
The upgrade to React 19 (
^19.0.0
) and React DOM 19 (^19.0.0
) is problematic as React 19 has not been officially released yet. This will cause installation failures.Recommend staying on the latest stable 18.x version:
- "react": "^19.0.0", - "react-dom": "^19.0.0", + "react": "^18.2.0", + "react-dom": "^18.2.0",
24-26
: Verify Node.js type definitions compatibilityThe Node.js types version (
^22.10.5
) seems to target a future Node.js version. This should align with your project's Node.js runtime version.Consider aligning the type versions with your project's Node.js version to avoid potential type mismatches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-25
: Consider adding error handling for data fetching operations.Currently, the data fetching operations do not handle potential errors, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections or rendering issues if any of the requests fail. Implement error handling mechanisms, such as try-catch blocks or error boundaries, to enhance the robustness of the component.
frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
24-30
: Add error handling for data fetching operations.The current implementation lacks error handling for the data fetching calls. If any of these requests fail, it could result in unhandled promise rejections or render issues. Incorporate error handling mechanisms such as try-catch blocks or React Error Boundaries to improve the application's resilience.
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (3)
1-1
: Consider removing unnecessary React importIn Next.js 13+, the React import is not required for JSX transformation.
-import React from "react";
7-10
: Consider adding more font weights for typography flexibilityThe current font configuration only includes weights 400 (normal) and 500 (medium). Consider adding more weights if the design system requires bold (600/700) or light (300) variations.
const urbanist = Urbanist({ - weight: ["400", "500"], + weight: ["300", "400", "500", "600"], subsets: ["latin"], });
12-16
: Consider using explicit type definition for propsFor better maintainability and readability, consider extracting the props interface.
+interface RootLayoutProps { + children: React.ReactNode; +} + -export default function RootLayout({ +export default function RootLayout({ children, -}: { - children: React.ReactNode; -}) { +}: RootLayoutProps) {frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx (1)
11-13
: Implement error handling for data fetchingCurrently, the data fetching operations do not handle potential errors from the GraphQL client requests. To improve the robustness of the component, consider adding error handling to manage possible exceptions.
Apply this diff to wrap the data fetching in a try-catch block:
const Community = async () => { + try { const navbarData = await graphQLClient.request<NavbarQueryType>(navbarQuery); const footerData = await graphQLClient.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery); const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error('Error fetching data:', error); + return <div>Error loading page</div>; + } return ( <div>frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx (1)
12-16
: Add error handling for data fetchingTo enhance the reliability of the component, consider adding error handling for the GraphQL data fetching operations. This ensures that any errors during data fetching are managed gracefully.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
const Earn = async () => { + try { const navbarData = await graphQLClient.request<NavbarQueryType>(navbarQuery); const footerData = await graphQLClient.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery); const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); const tabsData = await graphQLClient.request<TabSectionQueryType>(tabSectionQuery); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error('Error fetching data:', error); + return <div>Error loading page</div>; + } return ( <div>frontend/src/app/page.tsx (1)
12-16
: Consider adding error handling for data fetchingAdding error handling to the data fetching operations will improve the component's robustness by managing potential errors from the GraphQL requests.
You can wrap the data fetching in a try-catch block:
const Home = async () => { + try { const navbarData = await graphQLClient.request<NavbarQueryType>(navbarQuery); const partnersData = await graphQLClient.request<PartnersQueryType>(partnersQuery); const footerData = await graphQLClient.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery); const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error appropriately + console.error('Error fetching data:', error); + return <div>Error loading page</div>; + } return ( <div>frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx (1)
34-38
: Ensure consistent data prop naming and access patterns.In the component usages, data props are passed in varying formats—for example,
heroData={heroData.cooperativePageHero}
andreportsData={reportData}
. For better readability and maintainability, consider standardizing how you pass and access data props across all components.frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx (1)
41-47
: Ensure consistent data prop naming and access patterns.The data props passed to child components use varying structures—for instance,
heroData
is passed directly, whilebuyData
is destructured asbuyData: buyData.pnkTokenPageBuySection
. For consistency and clarity, consider standardizing the prop passing approach across all components.frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (1)
30-36
: Ensure consistent data prop naming and access patterns.Data props are being passed with varying destructuring methods, such as
{...{ heroData: heroData.forBuildersPageHero }}
and{...{ integrateData: integrateData.forBuildersPageIntegrateSection }}
. Consistent prop naming and passing can improve code readability. Consider standardizing this across all components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
frontend/src/pages/fonts/GeistMonoVF.woff
is excluded by!**/*.woff
frontend/src/pages/fonts/GeistVF.woff
is excluded by!**/*.woff
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx
(2 hunks)frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx
(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/Cooperative/ReportSection/DropdownContainer.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Cooperative/ReportSection/ReportCard.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Earn/TabSection/index.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/DesktopNavigation.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/MobileMenu.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Tab.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/_app.tsx
(0 hunks)frontend/src/pages/_document.tsx
(0 hunks)frontend/src/pages/api/hello.ts
(0 hunks)frontend/tsconfig.json
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- frontend/src/pages/api/hello.ts
- frontend/src/pages/_document.tsx
- frontend/src/pages/_app.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- frontend/src/components/Cooperative/ReportSection/DropdownContainer.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/MobileMenu.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Tab.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Cooperative/ReportSection/ReportCard.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Earn/TabSection/index.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/DesktopNavigation.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-website-v2
- GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-website-v2
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-website-v2
🔇 Additional comments (10)
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
1-24
: Verify App Router migration requirementsSince this is part of a Next.js migration, ensure all required App Router files are in place.
✅ Verification successful
App Router migration is complete but could be enhanced
The migration to the App Router has been successfully completed with proper route structure. Consider enhancing the user experience by adding:
loading.tsx
for loading stateserror.tsx
for error boundariesnot-found.tsx
for 404 handling🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for essential Next.js 13 App Router files and structure echo "Checking for essential Next.js App Router files..." # Check for page.tsx in app directory fd -t f "page.tsx" frontend/src/app # Check for loading and error handling fd -t f "(loading|error|not-found).tsx" frontend/src/app # Check if old pages directory still exists (should be migrated) if [ -d "frontend/src/pages" ]; then echo "Warning: pages directory still exists. Files should be migrated to app directory" ls -la frontend/src/pages fiLength of output: 443
frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx (2)
19-19
: Usage ofasync
function component is appropriate in Next.js 13 App Router.Defining the
Cooperative
component as anasync
function is acceptable and aligns with Next.js 13's App Router capabilities, allowing for direct data fetching within server components.
33-39
: Verify that child components accept the updated props structure.With the changes in data fetching and props passing, ensure that the child components (
Navbar
,Hero
,ReportSection
,MemberSection
, andFooter
) are updated accordingly to accept the new props structure to prevent potential runtime errors.frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx (2)
24-24
: Usage ofasync
function component is appropriate in Next.js 13 App Router.Defining
PNKToken
as anasync
function aligns with Next.js 13's App Router features, enabling data fetching directly within server components.
39-48
: Verify that child components accept the updated props structure.Due to changes in data fetching and prop structures, ensure that all child components (
Navbar
,Hero
,BuySection
,TokenNeedSection
,TokenomicsSection
, andFooter
) are updated to handle the new props correctly to avoid runtime errors.frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (2)
19-19
: Usage ofasync
function component is appropriate in Next.js 13 App Router.Defining
ForBuilders
as anasync
function is appropriate with Next.js 13's App Router, allowing data fetching directly within server components.
29-37
: Verify that child components accept the updated props structure.With the modifications in how data is fetched and passed, ensure that child components (
Navbar
,Hero
,UseCasesSection
,IntegrateSection
, andFooter
) are updated to accept the new props structure without causing any runtime issues.frontend/tsconfig.json (3)
3-7
: LGTM! Improved formatting for better readabilityThe multi-line formatting of arrays improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 20-22
31-39
: LGTM! Proper Next.js type inclusionThe include paths are correctly configured for Next.js, particularly the addition of
.next/types/**/*.ts
which is necessary for Next.js generated types.
24-29
: Consider using a more recent ECMAScript targetWhile "ES2017" works, consider using a more recent target like "ES2020" or "ES2021" for better browser compatibility and modern JavaScript features, as Next.js 15 supports newer ECMAScript versions.
Let's verify the Next.js setup is complete:
✅ Verification successful
Consider using a more recent ECMAScript target
While "ES2017" works, consider using a more recent target like "ES2020" or "ES2021" for better browser compatibility and modern JavaScript features, as Next.js 15 supports newer ECMAScript versions.
• The Next.js setup is correctly configured with next.config.mjs and proper .gitignore patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all necessary Next.js configuration files are present echo "Checking Next.js configuration..." files_to_check=("next.config.js" "next-env.d.ts") for file in "${files_to_check[@]}"; do if [ -f "frontend/$file" ]; then echo "✓ $file exists" else echo "✗ Missing $file" fi done # Verify next plugin in package.json if [ -f "frontend/package.json" ]; then echo "Checking next dependencies..." cat frontend/package.json | jq '.dependencies.next, .devDependencies.next' fiLength of output: 587
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check .gitignore for Next.js files echo "Checking .gitignore patterns..." if [ -f "frontend/.gitignore" ]; then echo "Frontend .gitignore contents:" cat frontend/.gitignore else echo "No frontend/.gitignore found" fi # Check if next-env.d.ts is generated during build echo -e "\nChecking for Next.js build artifacts..." find frontend -type f -name "next-env.d.ts" -o -name "next.config.*"Length of output: 785
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
Outdated
return ( | ||
<html lang="en"> | ||
<body className="antialiased"> | ||
<main className={urbanist.className}>{children}</main> | ||
</body> | ||
</html> | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add essential metadata for SEO and responsive design
The layout is missing important meta tags for SEO and responsive design. Consider adding metadata using Next.js 13's metadata API.
Add the following metadata configuration at the top of the file:
export const metadata = {
title: 'Kleros',
description: 'Kleros - The Justice Protocol',
viewport: 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1',
themeColor: '#000000',
};
Also, consider adding a head
element with favicon and other meta tags:
return (
<html lang="en">
+ <head>
+ <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" />
+ </head>
<body className="antialiased">
footerData: FooterQueryType; | ||
heroData: HeroQueryType; | ||
} | ||
const Community: React.FC = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type mismatch: Async functions with React.FC
The component Community
is declared as an async function but is typed with React.FC
. Since React.FC
expects a synchronous function returning a ReactElement
, this can lead to TypeScript type errors because an async function returns a Promise<ReactElement>
.
Consider removing the React.FC
type annotation or adjusting the return type accordingly.
Apply this diff to fix the type mismatch:
-const Community: React.FC = async () => {
+const Community = async () => {
Alternatively, explicitly specify the return type:
-const Community: React.FC = async () => {
+const Community: () => Promise<JSX.Element> = async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const Community: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Community = async () => { |
tabsData, | ||
navbarData, | ||
}) => { | ||
const Earn: React.FC = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type mismatch: Async functions with React.FC
The component Earn
is declared as an async function but is typed with React.FC
, which expects a synchronous function returning a ReactElement
. This may cause TypeScript type errors due to the function returning a Promise<ReactElement>
.
Apply this diff to correct the type annotation:
-const Earn: React.FC = async () => {
+const Earn = async () => {
Or explicitly specify the return type:
-const Earn: React.FC = async () => {
+const Earn: () => Promise<JSX.Element> = async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const Earn: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Earn = async () => { |
const Earn: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Earn: () => Promise<JSX.Element> = async () => { |
footerData: FooterQueryType; | ||
heroData: HeroQueryType["homePageHero"]; | ||
} | ||
const Home: React.FC = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Type mismatch: Async functions with React.FC
As previously noted in other components, the Home
component is an async function typed with React.FC
. This can cause TypeScript type errors because React.FC
expects a synchronous function returning a ReactElement
.
Apply this diff to fix the type annotation:
-const Home: React.FC = async () => {
+const Home = async () => {
Or explicitly define the return type:
-const Home: React.FC = async () => {
+const Home: () => Promise<JSX.Element> = async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const Home: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Home = async () => { |
const Home: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Home: () => Promise<JSX.Element> = async () => { |
const ForBuilders: React.FC = async () => { | ||
const navbarData = await graphQLClient.request<NavbarQueryType>(navbarQuery); | ||
const footerData = await graphQLClient.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery); | ||
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | ||
const useCasesData = | ||
await graphQLClient.request<UseCasesQueryType>(useCasesQuery); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for data fetching operations.
There is no error handling for the data fetching calls, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections or render issues if a request fails. Implement error handling, such as try-catch blocks or error boundaries, to enhance the component's robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx (1)
11-12
: Consider more explicit props passingUsing object spread for props makes it less clear what props are being passed. Consider explicit prop passing for better maintainability.
- <Hero heroData={heroData.communityPageHero} /> - <CommunitiesSection communities={heroData.communities} /> + <Hero + title={heroData.communityPageHero.title} + description={heroData.communityPageHero.description} + // ... other specific props + /> + <CommunitiesSection + communityList={heroData.communities} + // ... other specific props + />frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx (1)
14-15
: Simplify props spreading syntaxThe current props spreading syntax
{...{ heroData }}
is unnecessarily complex.- <Hero {...{ heroData }} /> - <TabSection {...{ tabsData }} /> + <Hero heroData={heroData} /> + <TabSection tabsData={tabsData} />frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (1)
24-30
: Consider creating a dedicated type for section dataLong prop names and nested data access could be simplified with dedicated types.
type BuildersPageData = { hero: HeroQueryType['forBuildersPageHero']; useCases: UseCasesQueryType['forBuildersPageUseCasesSection']; integrate: IntegrateQueryType['forBuildersPageIntegrateSection']; };Then simplify the component:
- <Hero {...{ heroData: heroData.forBuildersPageHero }} /> - <UseCasesSection - {...{ useCasesData: useCasesData.forBuildersPageUseCasesSection }} - /> - <IntegrateSection - {...{ integrateData: integrateData.forBuildersPageIntegrateSection }} - /> + <Hero data={pageData.hero} /> + <UseCasesSection data={pageData.useCases} /> + <IntegrateSection data={pageData.integrate} />frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
21-27
: Ensure consistent data fetching strategy between componentsCurrently, the
Navbar
data is fetched in theRootLayout
component, while theFooter
component fetches its own data internally. For consistency and better component encapsulation, consider moving the data fetching logic into theNavbar
component.Apply this diff to adjust the data fetching:
- const navbarData = await graphQLClient.request<NavbarQueryType>(navbarQuery); return ( <html lang="en"> <body className="antialiased"> <main className={urbanist.className}> - <Navbar {...{ navbarData }} /> + <Navbar /> {children} <Footer /> </main> </body> </html> );Then, update the
Navbar
component to fetch its own data internally, similar to theFooter
component.
25-25
: Consider adding a custom font to the entire applicationCurrently, the
urbanist
font class is applied to themain
element. To ensure that the font is applied consistently across all elements, consider applying the font class to thebody
element instead.Apply this diff to adjust the font application:
<html lang="en"> - <body className="antialiased"> - <main className={urbanist.className}> + <body className={`antialiased ${urbanist.className}`}> + <main>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/MobileMenu.tsx
(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx
(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/home/Hero.tsx
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/MobileMenu.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
frontend/src/components/home/Hero.tsx (1)
20-20
: Confirm the responsive behavior of the primary button.Adding
className="lg:hidden"
to the<div>
containing the primary button hides it on large screens. Ensure this change aligns with the intended user experience and that the primary action remains accessible on all relevant screen sizes.frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx (1)
6-6
: Remove React.FC type annotation for async componentThe component is declared as an async function but typed with React.FC, which expects a synchronous function returning ReactElement.
Apply this diff to fix the type annotation:
-const Community: React.FC = async () => { +const Community = async () => {frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx (1)
7-7
: Remove React.FC type annotation for async componentThe component is declared as an async function but typed with React.FC.
frontend/src/app/page.tsx (1)
7-7
: Remove React.FC type annotation for async componentThe component is declared as an async function but typed with React.FC.
frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (1)
15-21
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize multiple GraphQL requests with Promise.all
Three sequential GraphQL requests could significantly impact page load time.
const ForBuilders = async () => { + try { - const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); - const useCasesData = - await graphQLClient.request<UseCasesQueryType>(useCasesQuery); - const integrateData = - await graphQLClient.request<IntegrateQueryType>(integrateQuery); + const [heroData, useCasesData, integrateData] = await Promise.all([ + graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery), + graphQLClient.request<UseCasesQueryType>(useCasesQuery), + graphQLClient.request<IntegrateQueryType>(integrateQuery) + ]); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch builders page data:', error); + throw error; + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
frontend/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
3-4
: Add essential metadata for SEO and responsive designThe layout is missing important meta tags for SEO and responsive design. Consider adding metadata using Next.js 13's Metadata API.
As previously suggested, you can add the following metadata configuration at the top of the file:
export const metadata = { title: 'Kleros', description: 'Kleros - The Justice Protocol', viewport: 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1', themeColor: '#000000', };Also, include necessary meta tags in the
head
element:return ( <html lang="en"> + <head> + <link rel="icon" href="/favicon.ico" /> + </head> <body className="antialiased">
} from "@/queries/cooperative/report-section"; | ||
import { graphQLClient } from "@/utils/graphQLClient"; | ||
|
||
const Cooperative: React.FC = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust the type definition for the async component.
The component is declared as const Cooperative: React.FC = async () => {
, but React.FC
may not be appropriate for async components. Since the function is asynchronous, TypeScript may raise type errors. Consider omitting the React.FC
type annotation or adjusting it to correctly reflect the async nature of the component.
Apply this diff to fix the type definition:
-const Cooperative: React.FC = async () => {
+const Cooperative = async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const Cooperative: React.FC = async () => { | |
const Cooperative = async () => { |
} from "@/queries/pnk-token/tokenomics"; | ||
import { graphQLClient } from "@/utils/graphQLClient"; | ||
|
||
const PNKToken: React.FC = async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust the type definition for the async component.
The component is declared as const PNKToken: React.FC = async () => {
, but using React.FC
with an async function may lead to TypeScript type errors. Since the component is asynchronous, consider removing the React.FC
type annotation or modifying it to accurately represent an async function component.
Apply this diff to fix the type definition:
-const PNKToken: React.FC = async () => {
+const PNKToken = async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const PNKToken: React.FC = async () => { | |
const PNKToken = async () => { |
frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx
Outdated
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for GraphQL requests
The GraphQL request lacks error handling, which could lead to unhandled rejections if the request fails.
Add try-catch block:
const Community = async () => {
+ try {
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch community data:', error);
+ throw error; // Let error boundary handle it
+ }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx
Outdated
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | ||
const tabsData = | ||
await graphQLClient.request<TabSectionQueryType>(tabSectionQuery); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for multiple GraphQL requests
Multiple GraphQL requests without error handling could lead to partial data loading issues.
Add error handling:
const Earn = async () => {
+ try {
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery);
const tabsData =
await graphQLClient.request<TabSectionQueryType>(tabSectionQuery);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch earn page data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/app/page.tsx
Outdated
const partnersData = | ||
await graphQLClient.request<PartnersQueryType>(partnersQuery); | ||
const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize multiple data fetches with Promise.all
Sequential data fetches could impact page load performance.
const Home = async () => {
+ try {
- const partnersData =
- await graphQLClient.request<PartnersQueryType>(partnersQuery);
- const heroData = await graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery);
+ const [partnersData, heroData] = await Promise.all([
+ graphQLClient.request<PartnersQueryType>(partnersQuery),
+ graphQLClient.request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery)
+ ]);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch home page data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx
Outdated
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | ||
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | ||
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | ||
})); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle potential promise rejection in data fetching
The data fetching logic using .then()
does not handle potential errors from the GraphQL request. To ensure robust error handling, consider adding a .catch()
block or using try-catch
with async/await.
Apply this diff to handle errors:
- .then((result) => ({
+ .then((result) => {
+ return {
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials,
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section,
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta,
- }));
+ };
+ })
+ .catch((error) => {
+ console.error("Error fetching footer data:", error);
+ // Handle the error appropriately
+ });
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | |
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | |
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | |
})); | |
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | |
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | |
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | |
}; | |
}) | |
.catch((error) => { | |
console.error("Error fetching footer data:", error); | |
// Handle the error appropriately | |
}); |
frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx
Outdated
const Footer: React.FC = async () => { | ||
const { socials, sections, cta } = await graphQLClient | ||
.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery) | ||
.then((result) => ({ | ||
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | ||
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | ||
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | ||
})); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid using async functions in React functional components
Defining the Footer
component as an async function may cause issues when used as a client-side component. In React, functional components should not be async functions because they cannot handle promises returned from render functions. This can lead to unexpected behavior or rendering issues.
Consider fetching the data within a useEffect
hook or using server-side data fetching methods provided by Next.js.
Apply this diff to refactor the component:
-const Footer: React.FC = async () => {
+const Footer: React.FC = () => {
+ const [data, setData] = React.useState(null);
+
+ React.useEffect(() => {
+ graphQLClient
+ .request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery)
+ .then((result) => {
+ setData({
+ socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials,
+ sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section,
+ cta: result.footerSubscribeCta,
+ });
+ });
+ }, []);
+
+ if (!data) {
+ return null; // Or render a loading indicator
+ }
+
+ const { socials, sections, cta } = data;
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const Footer: React.FC = async () => { | |
const { socials, sections, cta } = await graphQLClient | |
.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery) | |
.then((result) => ({ | |
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | |
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | |
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | |
})); | |
const Footer: React.FC = () => { | |
const [data, setData] = React.useState(null); | |
React.useEffect(() => { | |
graphQLClient | |
.request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery) | |
.then((result) => { | |
setData({ | |
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | |
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | |
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | |
}); | |
}); | |
}, []); | |
if (!data) { | |
return null; // Or render a loading indicator | |
} | |
const { socials, sections, cta } = data; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (1)
15-19
:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and loading states for data fetching.
Multiple GraphQL requests without error handling could lead to uncaught errors and poor user experience.
const ForBuilders: React.FC = async () => { + try { const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); const useCasesData = await request<UseCasesQueryType>(useCasesQuery); const integrateData = await request<IntegrateQueryType>(integrateQuery); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch data:', error); + throw error; + }frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1)
13-13
:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid async React components
Using async functions directly as React components can lead to rendering issues and lifecycle problems.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/src/utils/graphQLClient.tsx (1)
10-12
: Add request timeout configuration.The GraphQL client should have a timeout configuration to prevent hanging requests. This is especially important for server-side rendering where long-running requests can impact page load times.
const graphQLClient = new GraphQLClient(endpoint, { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${token}` }, + timeout: 10000, // 10 seconds timeout });
frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx (1)
22-28
: Avoid props spreading for better maintainability.Using the spread operator with props makes it harder to track prop dependencies and can lead to prop drilling. Consider passing specific props instead.
- <Hero {...{ heroData: heroData.forBuildersPageHero }} /> + <Hero heroData={heroData.forBuildersPageHero} /> - <UseCasesSection - {...{ useCasesData: useCasesData.forBuildersPageUseCasesSection }} - /> + <UseCasesSection + useCasesData={useCasesData.forBuildersPageUseCasesSection} + /> - <IntegrateSection - {...{ integrateData: integrateData.forBuildersPageIntegrateSection }} - /> + <IntegrateSection + integrateData={integrateData.forBuildersPageIntegrateSection} + />frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx (1)
32-39
: Inconsistent props spreading patterns.The component uses different styles of props spreading which makes the code less maintainable. Standardize the approach across all components.
- <Hero {...{ heroData }} /> + <Hero heroData={heroData} /> - <BuySection {...{ buyData: buyData.pnkTokenPageBuySection }} /> + <BuySection buyData={buyData.pnkTokenPageBuySection} /> - <TokenNeedSection - {...{ tokenNeedData: tokenNeedData.pnkTokenPageNeedSection }} - /> + <TokenNeedSection + tokenNeedData={tokenNeedData.pnkTokenPageNeedSection} + /> - <TokenomicsSection - {...{ tokenomicsData: tokenomicsData.pnkTokenPageTokenomicsSection }} - /> + <TokenomicsSection + tokenomicsData={tokenomicsData.pnkTokenPageTokenomicsSection} + />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/for-builders/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx
(1 hunks)frontend/src/utils/graphQLClient.tsx
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- frontend/src/app/page.tsx
- frontend/src/app/layout.tsx
- frontend/src/app/earn/page.tsx
- frontend/src/app/community/page.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - kleros-website-v2
- GitHub Check: Header rules - kleros-website-v2
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - kleros-website-v2
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/src/app/cooperative/page.tsx (1)
15-15
: Adjust the type definition for the async component.Using
React.FC
with an async component may not be type-safe.-const Cooperative: React.FC = async () => { +const Cooperative = async () => {frontend/src/app/pnk-token/page.tsx (2)
20-20
: Adjust the type definition for the async component.Using
React.FC
with an async component may not be type-safe.-const PNKToken: React.FC = async () => { +const PNKToken = async () => {
21-28
: Add error handling for data fetching operations.Multiple GraphQL requests without error handling could lead to uncaught errors.
+ try { const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); const buyData = await request<BuySectionQueryType>(buySectionQuery); const tokenNeedData = await request<TokenNeedSectionQueryType>( tokenNeedSectionQuery, ); const tokenomicsData = await request<TokenomicsSectionQueryType>( tokenomicsSectionQuery, ); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch data:', error); + throw error; + }frontend/src/components/Footer.tsx (1)
8-9
: LGTM! Clean import additions for GraphQL functionality.The new imports are well-organized and necessary for the GraphQL data fetching implementation.
export async function request<T>( | ||
document: RequestDocument | TypedDocumentNode<T, object>, | ||
variables?: object, | ||
) { | ||
return await graphQLClient.request<T>(document, variables); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to the request function.
The request function should include error handling to properly handle and transform GraphQL errors. This will help with debugging and provide better error messages to consumers.
export async function request<T>(
document: RequestDocument | TypedDocumentNode<T, object>,
variables?: object,
) {
- return await graphQLClient.request<T>(document, variables);
+ try {
+ return await graphQLClient.request<T>(document, variables);
+ } catch (error) {
+ if (error.response?.errors) {
+ console.error('GraphQL Errors:', error.response.errors);
+ }
+ throw error;
+ }
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export async function request<T>( | |
document: RequestDocument | TypedDocumentNode<T, object>, | |
variables?: object, | |
) { | |
return await graphQLClient.request<T>(document, variables); | |
} | |
export async function request<T>( | |
document: RequestDocument | TypedDocumentNode<T, object>, | |
variables?: object, | |
) { | |
try { | |
return await graphQLClient.request<T>(document, variables); | |
} catch (error) { | |
if (error.response?.errors) { | |
console.error('GraphQL Errors:', error.response.errors); | |
} | |
throw error; | |
} | |
} |
const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | ||
const reportData = await request<CooperativePageReportQueryType>( | ||
cooperativePageReportQuery, | ||
); | ||
const memberSectionData = await request<CooperativePageMemberQueryType>( | ||
cooperativePageMemberQuery, | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundaries and loading states.
Multiple sequential data fetches without error handling could lead to poor user experience if any request fails.
+ try {
const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery);
const reportData = await request<CooperativePageReportQueryType>(
cooperativePageReportQuery,
);
const memberSectionData = await request<CooperativePageMemberQueryType>(
cooperativePageMemberQuery,
);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | |
const reportData = await request<CooperativePageReportQueryType>( | |
cooperativePageReportQuery, | |
); | |
const memberSectionData = await request<CooperativePageMemberQueryType>( | |
cooperativePageMemberQuery, | |
); | |
try { | |
const heroData = await request<HeroQueryType>(heroQuery); | |
const reportData = await request<CooperativePageReportQueryType>( | |
cooperativePageReportQuery, | |
); | |
const memberSectionData = await request<CooperativePageMemberQueryType>( | |
cooperativePageMemberQuery, | |
); | |
} catch (error) { | |
console.error('Failed to fetch data:', error); | |
throw error; | |
} |
const { socials, sections, cta } = await request<FooterQueryType>( | ||
footerQuery, | ||
).then((result) => ({ | ||
socials: result.footerSocialsSection.socials, | ||
sections: result.footerLinksSection.Section, | ||
cta: result.footerSubscribeCta, | ||
})); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement proper error handling and follow Next.js data fetching patterns
The current implementation has several issues:
- Missing error handling for failed requests
- Not following Next.js 13+ data fetching best practices
- No loading state management
Consider this implementation using Next.js patterns:
-const Footer: React.FC = async () => {
+// pages/api/footer.ts
+export async function getFooterData() {
+ try {
+ const data = await request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery);
+ return {
+ socials: data.footerSocialsSection.socials,
+ sections: data.footerLinksSection.Section,
+ cta: data.footerSubscribeCta,
+ };
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch footer data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }
+}
+
+// components/Footer.tsx
+const Footer: React.FC = () => {
+ const [footerData, setFooterData] = useState<FooterData | null>(null);
+ const [error, setError] = useState<Error | null>(null);
+
+ useEffect(() => {
+ getFooterData()
+ .then(setFooterData)
+ .catch(setError);
+ }, []);
+
+ if (error) return <div>Failed to load footer</div>;
+ if (!footerData) return <div>Loading...</div>;
+
+ const { socials, sections, cta } = footerData;
Or better yet, use Next.js 13+ Server Components:
// app/components/Footer.tsx
import { request } from "@/utils/graphQLClient";
async function Footer() {
try {
const data = await request<FooterQueryType>(footerQuery);
const { socials, sections, cta } = {
socials: data.footerSocialsSection.socials,
sections: data.footerLinksSection.Section,
cta: data.footerSubscribeCta,
};
// Your existing JSX here
} catch (error) {
// Error UI
return <div>Failed to load footer</div>;
}
}
Summary by CodeRabbit
Dependencies
Package Management
New Features
Footer
component to fetch its own data.Refactor
Removal