feat: for builders page #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive set of components and queries for the "For Builders" page in a React and Next.js application. The changes include creating new GraphQL queries for hero, use cases, and integration sections, developing multiple React components to render these sections, and adding styling modifications. The implementation focuses on creating a modular, data-driven approach to building the page, with components that dynamically render content based on GraphQL query results. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ForBuildersPage
participant GraphQLClient
participant HeroQuery
participant UseCasesQuery
participant IntegrateQuery
Client->>ForBuildersPage: Request page
ForBuildersPage->>GraphQLClient: Fetch page data
GraphQLClient->>HeroQuery: Request hero data
GraphQLClient->>UseCasesQuery: Request use cases data
GraphQLClient->>IntegrateQuery: Request integration data
GraphQLClient-->>ForBuildersPage: Return query results
ForBuildersPage->>Client: Render page with dynamic content
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-website-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
kemuru
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
frontend/src/queries/for-builders/hero.tsx (1)
3-25: Add JSDoc documentation for the query.Consider adding documentation to describe the purpose and usage of this query, especially since it's exported and likely used across different components.
+/** + * GraphQL query to fetch hero section data for the builders page. + * @returns Hero section data including title, subtitle, CTA button, arrow link, and background image. + */ export const heroQuery = gql`frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx (2)
9-13: Consider creating a dedicated type for hero data.While the current typing is correct, consider extracting the hero data type to improve readability and reusability:
+type ForBuildersHeroData = HeroQueryType["forBuildersPageHero"]; + interface IForBuilders { navbarData: NavbarQueryType; footerData: FooterQueryType; - heroData: HeroQueryType["forBuildersPageHero"]; + heroData: ForBuildersHeroData; }
15-27: Consider semantic HTML and explicit prop passing.Two suggestions for improvement:
- Use a semantic HTML element like
maininstead ofdivfor better accessibility.- Be explicit about prop spreading to improve code maintainability.
const ForBuilders: React.FC<IForBuilders> = ({ footerData, heroData, navbarData, }) => { return ( - <div> - <Navbar {...{ navbarData }} /> - <Hero {...{ heroData }} /> - <Footer {...{ footerData }} /> - </div> + <main> + <Navbar data={navbarData} /> + <Hero data={heroData} /> + <Footer data={footerData} /> + </main> ); };frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx (2)
21-25: Enhance security for external links.When using
target="_blank", it's recommended to addrel="noopener noreferrer"to prevent potential security vulnerabilities. Whilerel="noopener noreferrer"is present, consider addingaria-labelfor better accessibility.<Link href={heroData.button.link.url} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" + aria-label={`Open ${heroData.button.text} in new tab`} >Also applies to: 33-38
17-20: Enhance accessibility with proper heading structure.The heading and paragraph could benefit from additional semantic markup and accessibility improvements.
-<div className="space-y-6"> +<div className="space-y-6" role="banner"> - <h1 className="text-3xl w-min">{heroData.title}</h1> + <h1 className="text-3xl w-min font-bold" tabIndex={0}>{heroData.title}</h1> - <p className="text-lg">{heroData.subtitle}</p> + <p className="text-lg text-gray-700" tabIndex={0}>{heroData.subtitle}</p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/queries/for-builders/hero.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
frontend/src/queries/for-builders/hero.tsx (1)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement is correct and necessary for defining GraphQL queries.
frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and complete.
The imports are logically grouped and include all necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
43-43: LGTM! Default export is correctly implemented.
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx (2)
1-12: LGTM! Well-structured imports and type definitions.
The imports are organized logically and the interface properly leverages TypeScript for type safety.
8-8: Verify GraphQL schema alignment.
Let's ensure the component's data requirements align with the GraphQL schema.
Also applies to: 11-11
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the GraphQL schema alignment.
GraphQL schema and component integration verified successfully
The component's data requirements perfectly align with the GraphQL schema:
- The
HeroQueryType["forBuildersPageHero"]type is correctly imported and used in the component props - The schema defines all fields (
title,subtitle,button,arrowLink) that are used in the Hero component - The data flow is consistent from the GraphQL query through the page component to the Hero component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GraphQL schema alignment with component props
# Test: Check if the GraphQL query matches the component's data structure
rg -A 10 "forBuildersPageHero" --type ts
Length of output: 3100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (28)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/index.tsx (2)
6-8: Consider improving type safety for prop spreading.While the interface is well-defined, the component's usage of spread operator with props could be more type-safe.
Consider explicitly typing the props passed to child components:
interface IKeyChallenges { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; } +type HeaderProps = { + useCasesData: IKeyChallenges["useCasesData"]; +}; +type HowKlerosSolvesItProps = { + useCasesData: IKeyChallenges["useCasesData"]; +};
10-17: Consider semantic HTML and explicit prop passing.The component structure could be improved in two ways:
- Use semantic HTML for better accessibility
- Make prop passing more explicit
Consider applying these improvements:
-const KeyChallenges: React.FC<IKeyChallenges> = ({ useCasesData }) => { +const KeyChallenges: React.FC<IKeyChallenges> = ({ useCasesData }) => { return ( - <div> + <section className="key-challenges"> - <Header {...{ useCasesData }} /> - <HowKlerosSolvesIt {...{ useCasesData }} /> + <Header useCasesData={useCasesData} /> + <HowKlerosSolvesIt useCasesData={useCasesData} /> - </div> + </section> ); };frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx (1)
11-18: Enhance semantic structure and accessibilityWhile the component works, it could benefit from improved semantic HTML and accessibility:
Consider applying these improvements:
- <div> + <header role="banner"> - <h2 className="text-xl mb-6 text-primary-text"> + <h2 className="text-xl mb-6 text-primary-text" id="key-challenges-title"> {useCasesData.keyChallenges.title} </h2> - <p className="text-lg mb-12 text-secondary-text"> + <p + className="text-lg mb-12 text-secondary-text" + aria-labelledby="key-challenges-title" + > {useCasesData.keyChallenges.description} </p> - </div> + </header>frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/index.tsx (2)
9-11: Consider documenting the expected data shape and improving prop passing.While the interface is well-typed, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the expected shape and purpose of
useCasesData.- Being more explicit about which specific fields each child component needs, rather than passing the entire data object.
Example improvement:
+/** + * Props for the DAOSection component + * @property {UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]} useCasesData - Data from GraphQL query containing + * header, challenges, and additional information for the DAO section + */ interface IDAOSection { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; }
13-21: Consider using semantic HTML and adding styling props.The component structure is clean, but could be improved by:
- Using a semantic HTML element (e.g.,
section) instead of adiv- Adding appropriate ARIA attributes for accessibility
- Including styling props or className for layout control
Example improvement:
-const DAOSection: React.FC<IDAOSection> = ({ useCasesData }) => { +const DAOSection: React.FC<IDAOSection> = ({ useCasesData, className }) => { return ( - <div> + <section + className={className} + aria-labelledby="dao-section-title" + > <Header {...{ useCasesData }} /> <KeyChallenges {...{ useCasesData }} /> <LearnMore {...{ useCasesData }} /> - </div> + </section> ); };frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/index.tsx (4)
5-5: Remove the.tsxextension from the import statementFor consistency with other imports and React conventions, remove the file extension.
-import DAOSection from "./DAOSection.tsx"; +import DAOSection from "./DAOSection";
7-9: Consider extracting shared prop typesSince both
UseCasesCardsandDAOSectioncomponents receive the same props through spreading, consider extracting a shared interface to make the prop requirements more explicit and maintainable.interface IUseCasesSectionData { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; } interface IUseCasesSection extends IUseCasesSectionData {}
17-18: Avoid prop spreading for better maintainabilityProp spreading (
{...{ useCasesData }}) makes it less clear what props each child component actually requires. Consider explicitly passing required props.- <UseCasesCards {...{ useCasesData }} /> - <DAOSection {...{ useCasesData }} /> + <UseCasesCards useCasesData={useCasesData} /> + <DAOSection useCasesData={useCasesData} />
13-13: Consider using responsive padding utilitiesThe current padding classes (
pt-16 pb-16 px-6) might not scale well across different screen sizes. Consider using Tailwind's responsive modifiers.- <div className="relative pt-16 pb-16 px-6 bg-background-1"> + <div className="relative py-8 px-4 md:py-16 md:px-6 bg-background-1">frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/Header.tsx (1)
13-19: Enhance responsive typography and spacing.The current fixed text sizes and margins might not provide the best experience across different screen sizes.
Consider applying these responsive utilities:
-<div className="mb-16"> +<div className="mb-8 md:mb-16"> - <h2 className="text-xl mb-6 text-primary-purple"> + <h2 className="text-lg md:text-xl mb-4 md:mb-6 text-primary-purple"> {useCasesData.useCaseTitle} </h2> - <p className="text-lg mb-12 text-secondary-text"> + <p className="text-base md:text-lg mb-8 md:mb-12 text-secondary-text"> {useCasesData.useCaseDescription} </p>frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/UseCasesCards.tsx (4)
1-2: Remove unnecessary React importSince React 17+, the
import React from "react"statement is no longer required for JSX usage due to the new JSX transform.import { UseCasesQueryType } from "@/queries/for-builders/use-cases"; -import React from "react";
4-6: Add JSDoc documentation for better type clarityConsider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the expected shape and purpose of the useCasesData prop.
+/** + * Props for the UseCasesCards component + * @property {Object} useCasesData - Data containing an array of use cases with their names + */ interface IUseCasesCards { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; }
8-8: Remove React.FC type annotationThe
React.FCtype annotation is discouraged as it implicitly includes the children prop which this component doesn't use. Use a more explicit type annotation instead.-const UseCasesCards: React.FC<IUseCasesCards> = ({ useCasesData }) => { +const UseCasesCards = ({ useCasesData }: IUseCasesCards) => {
14-18: Extract conditional styling logicThe inline conditional styling makes the code harder to maintain. Consider extracting it into a separate function or using Tailwind's @apply directive.
+const getUseCaseClassName = (isFirst: boolean) => + isFirst + ? "bg-primary-purple text-lg text-white px-8 py-4 rounded-full" + : "border-gradient-purple-blue text-lg text-secondary-text px-8 py-4"; // Then in JSX: -className={`${ - index === 0 - ? "bg-primary-purple text-lg text-white px-8 py-4 rounded-full" - : "border-gradient-purple-blue text-lg text-secondary-text px-8 py-4" -}`} +className={getUseCaseClassName(index === 0)}frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/LearnMore.tsx (2)
10-12: Add JSDoc documentation for better code maintainability.Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the interface and its prop.
+/** + * Props for the LearnMore component + * @property {UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]} useCasesData - Data from GraphQL query containing link and text information + */ interface ILearnMore { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; }
14-32: Consider improving component flexibility and error handling.While the implementation is functional, there are several opportunities for improvement:
interface ILearnMore { useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; + imageSize?: number; + className?: string; + textClassName?: string; } -const LearnMore: React.FC<ILearnMore> = ({ useCasesData }) => { +const LearnMore: React.FC<ILearnMore> = ({ + useCasesData, + imageSize = 24, + className = "block mt-16 text-center", + textClassName = "mr-4 text-lg text-primary-blue" +}) => { + if (!useCasesData?.arrowLink?.link?.url) { + return null; + } + return ( <Link href={useCasesData.arrowLink.link.url} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" - className="block mt-16 text-center" + className={className} > - <span className="mr-4 text-lg text-primary-blue">{useCasesData.arrowLink.text}</span> + <span className={textClassName}>{useCasesData.arrowLink.text}</span> <Image src={LinkArrow} - width="24" - height="24" - alt="Arrow link image" + width={imageSize} + height={imageSize} + alt={`External link arrow for ${useCasesData.arrowLink.text}`} className="inline" /> </Link> ); };These changes:
- Make the component more reusable with customizable styles
- Add proper error handling for missing data
- Improve accessibility with more descriptive alt text
- Make image dimensions configurable
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/LearnMore.tsx (2)
10-12: Consider making the interface more specific.Instead of using the entire section data type, consider creating a more focused type that only includes the properties actually used in this component (
arrowLink).+type ArrowLink = { + arrowLink: { + text: string; + link: { + url: string; + }; + }; +}; + interface ILearnMore { - integrateData: IntegrateQueryType["forBuildersPageIntegrateSection"]; + integrateData: ArrowLink; }
29-29: Improve alt text description.The current alt text "Arrow link image" is generic. Consider making it more descriptive of its purpose, such as "Learn more about integration".
- alt="Arrow link image" + alt="Learn more about integration"frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/index.tsx (1)
9-11: Consider direct prop passing instead of object spreading.While the interface is well-defined, the way props are passed to child components (lines 22-23) suggests potential prop drilling. Consider passing only the required data to child components instead of the entire integrateData object.
Example refactor:
- <GetInTouch {...{ integrateData }} /> - <LearnMore {...{ integrateData }} /> + <GetInTouch + header={integrateData.getInTouchSection.header} + buttonUrl={integrateData.getInTouchSection.buttonUrl} + /> + <LearnMore + header={integrateData.learnMoreSection.header} + link={integrateData.learnMoreSection.link} + />frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/GetInTouch.tsx (1)
17-20: Enhance responsive typographyThe current
text-xlclass might not provide optimal reading experience across all device sizes. Consider using Tailwind's responsive modifiers for better scaling:- <h2 className="text-primary-text text-xl mb-8"> + <h2 className="text-primary-text text-lg md:text-xl lg:text-2xl mb-8">frontend/src/queries/for-builders/integrate.tsx (1)
1-2: Consider reorganizing type definitionsThe
AppsSectiontype is imported from a navbar module, which seems counterintuitive. Consider moving shared types to a dedicated types directory to prevent potential circular dependencies and improve code organization.import { gql } from "graphql-request"; -import { AppsSection } from "../navbar"; +import { AppsSection } from "../types/apps";frontend/src/styles/globals.css (1)
74-88: Consider browser compatibility and maintainability improvements.While the gradient border implementation is creative, there are a few suggestions to improve it:
- Consider extracting the gradient colors to CSS variables for better maintainability
- Add vendor prefixes for better browser support
- Consider adding a fallback for browsers that don't support mask-composite
Here's a suggested improvement:
.border-gradient-purple-blue::before { content: ""; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; border-radius: inherit; padding: 2px; - background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #9747ff, #27cdfe); + background: linear-gradient(to bottom, var(--gradient-start, #9747ff), var(--gradient-end, #27cdfe)); -webkit-mask: linear-gradient(#000 0 0) content-box, linear-gradient(#000 0 0); - mask: linear-gradient(#000 0 0) content-box, linear-gradient(#000 0 0); + -webkit-mask-composite: xor; + mask: linear-gradient(#000 0 0) content-box, linear-gradient(#000 0 0); mask-composite: exclude; z-index: -1; }Add these variables to your
:root::root { --gradient-start: #9747ff; --gradient-end: #27cdfe; }frontend/src/components/Navbar/AppsDropdownContent/Card.tsx (1)
10-10: Consider making border radius responsive.Since this PR focuses on mobile-first development, consider making the border radius responsive to different screen sizes if needed.
- "bg-background-2 rounded-2xl border border-stroke text-wrap", + "bg-background-2 rounded-xl lg:rounded-2xl border border-stroke text-wrap",frontend/src/queries/for-builders/use-cases.tsx (1)
3-50: Consider adding a query name and handling nullable fieldsThe GraphQL query could be improved for better maintainability and robustness.
Consider applying these improvements:
-export const useCasesQuery = gql` - { +export const useCasesQuery = gql` + query GetForBuildersUseCases { forBuildersPageUseCasesSection { sectionHeader useCases { name }Also, consider explicitly marking nullable fields with
@skipor@includedirectives if any fields are optional.frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx (2)
1-11: LGTM! Consider enhancing hover effect accessibility.The imports are well-organized and the hover effect is properly defined as a reusable constant. However, consider adding
@media (prefers-reduced-motion)support for users who prefer minimal animations.const hoverEffect = clsx( - "hover:scale-[1.03] transform transition duration-100" + "hover:scale-[1.03] transform transition duration-100", + "@media (prefers-reduced-motion) { hover:scale-100 transition-none }" );
23-37: Consider adding loading states for dynamic content.The solution section could benefit from loading states while data is being fetched:
- Add loading skeletons or placeholders
- Handle undefined states gracefully
<div className="bg-background-2 border border-stroke rounded-2xl p-6"> + {!useCasesData.solutionSections ? ( + <div className="animate-pulse"> + <div className="h-6 bg-gray-200 rounded w-3/4 mb-4"></div> + <div className="h-4 bg-gray-200 rounded w-full mb-8"></div> + </div> + ) : ( <h2 className="text-xl mb-4">{useCasesData.solutionSections.title}</h2> <div className="text-lg text-secondary-text mb-8"> {useCasesData.solutionSections.description} </div> + )}frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx (2)
19-25: Consider following React naming conventions for props interface.While the interface is well-defined and properly typed, consider renaming it to follow React component props naming convention.
-interface IForBuilders { +interface ForBuildersProps { navbarData: NavbarQueryType; footerData: FooterQueryType; heroData: HeroQueryType["forBuildersPageHero"]; useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; integrateData: IntegrateQueryType["forBuildersPageIntegrateSection"]; }
27-43: Consider using semantic HTML elements.While the component structure is clean, consider using semantic HTML elements for better accessibility and SEO.
const ForBuilders: React.FC<IForBuilders> = ({ footerData, heroData, navbarData, useCasesData, integrateData, }) => { return ( - <div> + <main> <Navbar {...{ navbarData }} /> <Hero {...{ heroData }} /> <UseCasesSection {...{ useCasesData }} /> <IntegrateSection {...{ integrateData }} /> <Footer {...{ footerData }} /> - </div> + </main> ); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/GetInTouch.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/LearnMore.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/Header.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/LearnMore.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/UseCasesCards.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/AppsDropdownContent/Card.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/AppsDropdownContent/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/queries/for-builders/integrate.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/queries/for-builders/use-cases.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/styles/globals.css(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/AppsDropdownContent/index.tsx
- frontend/src/components/Navbar/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (25)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/index.tsx (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.
All required dependencies are properly imported with correct paths.
1-18: Verify component integration and consistency.
Let's ensure this component is properly integrated and follows consistent patterns with sibling components.
✅ Verification successful
Component integration and patterns are consistent
The KeyChallenges component is properly integrated and follows consistent patterns:
- Correctly imported and used in DAOSection/index.tsx with consistent prop spreading
- All components (KeyChallenges, Header, HowKlerosSolvesIt) follow the same interface pattern with
useCasesDataprop - Component hierarchy and data flow are consistent with the parent DAOSection component
- Sibling components maintain consistent TypeScript interfaces and React.FC typing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check component integration and pattern consistency
# Check if the component is imported and used
echo "Checking KeyChallenges usage:"
rg -p "import.*KeyChallenges.*from" --type typescript
# Check for similar patterns in sibling components
echo "\nChecking similar component patterns in the same directory:"
fd --extension tsx --extension ts . "$(dirname $(fd KeyChallenges/index.tsx))" --exec ast-grep --pattern 'interface I$_ {
useCasesData: $_
}'
# Verify consistent prop spreading patterns
echo "\nChecking prop spreading patterns:"
rg -p "\{\.\.\." --type typescript "$(dirname $(fd KeyChallenges/index.tsx))"
Length of output: 878
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach with more reliable commands
# Check if the component is imported and used
echo "Checking KeyChallenges usage:"
rg "import.*KeyChallenges"
# Check for similar patterns in sibling components
echo -e "\nChecking files in the same directory:"
fd "index.tsx" -p "$(dirname $(fd "KeyChallenges/index.tsx" | head -n1))"
# Check interface patterns and prop spreading
echo -e "\nChecking interface patterns and prop spreading:"
fd "index.tsx" -p "$(dirname $(fd "KeyChallenges/index.tsx" | head -n1))" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 937
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Simplify the approach to focus on key verifications
# Check the parent component that imports KeyChallenges
echo "Checking parent component (DAOSection/index.tsx):"
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/index.tsx
# Check sibling components structure
echo -e "\nListing files in KeyChallenges directory:"
fd . frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/
# Check Header and HowKlerosSolvesIt components
echo -e "\nChecking Header component:"
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header/index.tsx
echo -e "\nChecking HowKlerosSolvesIt component:"
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt/index.tsx
Length of output: 1884
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual Header and HowKlerosSolvesIt components (they are .tsx files, not directories)
echo "Checking Header component:"
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx
echo -e "\nChecking HowKlerosSolvesIt component:"
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx
# Check for other similar sections to verify pattern consistency
echo -e "\nChecking other sections in UseCasesSection:"
fd . frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/ -d 1
Length of output: 3402
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx (1)
1-7: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions
The imports are well-organized and the TypeScript interface is properly defined.
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/index.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are logically organized with external dependencies first, followed by internal components and types.
13-21: Verify component integration in the UseCasesSection.
Let's verify how this component is integrated within the parent UseCasesSection component.
✅ Verification successful
Component is properly integrated within the UseCasesSection
The DAOSection component is correctly imported and used in the parent UseCasesSection component, with proper props passing. The component follows the same pattern as other section components in the codebase (IntegrateSection, UseCasesSection) and maintains a consistent structure with its own subcomponents (Header, KeyChallenges, LearnMore).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DAOSection usage in parent components
rg -t typescript -t tsx "DAOSection" "frontend/src/components/ForBuilders"
# Check if there are any similar section components that might need consistent styling
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_Section: React.FC<$_> = ({ $_ }) => {
return (
<div>
$$$
</div>
);
}'
Length of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for DAOSection usage with correct file extensions
rg "DAOSection" frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/ -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts"
# Look for similar section components
rg "Section: React\.FC" frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/ -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts"
# Check the directory structure to understand the component hierarchy
fd . frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/ --type f -e tsx -e ts
Length of output: 2101
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/Header.tsx (2)
7-9: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.
The interface is properly typed using the GraphQL query type, ensuring type safety for the component props.
11-28: Verify data fetching and error handling.
The component assumes data will always be available but should handle potential loading and error states.
Let's verify the GraphQL query implementation and error handling:
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/UseCasesCards.tsx (1)
1-26: Verify GraphQL query type and component usage
Let's verify the GraphQL query type structure and how this component is being used in parent components.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL query type and component usage are correctly implemented
The verification confirms:
- The
UseCasesQueryTypematches the component's usage, containing the expectedforBuildersPageUseCasesSectionwithuseCasesarray of objects havingnameproperty - The component is properly used in
ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/index.tsxwith correct prop passing - The data structure and component implementation are consistent throughout
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check GraphQL query type definition
echo "Checking GraphQL query type definition:"
rg -A 10 "type UseCasesQueryType"
# Check component usage
echo "Checking component usage:"
rg -A 5 "UseCasesCards"
Length of output: 3172
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/LearnMore.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports follow a logical grouping pattern and include all necessary dependencies.
16-20: Verify consistent security attributes for external links.
The security attributes for the external link are correctly implemented here. Let's verify this pattern is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
External links consistently implement security attributes
All instances of external links (target="_blank") in the TypeScript/TSX files are properly secured with the rel="noopener noreferrer" attribute, following security best practices. The pattern is consistently implemented across the entire codebase, including components in the navbar, footer, hero sections, and other UI components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Next.js Link components with target="_blank" to ensure they all have proper security attributes
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'target="_blank"' -C 2
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Link components with target="_blank" to ensure they all have proper security attributes
rg 'target="_blank"' --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts -C 2
Length of output: 7169
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/LearnMore.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.
The imports follow a clean organization pattern: React core, Next.js components, assets, and local types.
14-34: LGTM! Component implementation is secure and well-structured.
The component:
- Correctly implements external link security attributes
- Uses proper Next.js components for links and images
- Follows mobile-first approach with responsive styling
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/index.tsx (1)
1-7: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and all used.
The imports are logically grouped and all are utilized within the component.
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/GetInTouch.tsx (3)
10-12: LGTM! Well-typed interface definition
The interface is properly typed using the GraphQL query type, making it type-safe and maintainable.
4-4: Remove commented import if background image implementation is postponed
The commented Image import suggests an incomplete implementation of the background image feature. If this feature is postponed, we should remove the commented code. If it's planned for immediate implementation, we should complete it now.
Let's check if there are any other Image implementations in the codebase that could serve as a reference:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the specific file to understand if the Image component is actually needed:
Remove commented Image component code
The file shows a commented-out Image component that was intended to be used as a background image. Since the component is working without this background image and there's no active implementation or styling referencing it, we should remove both the import and the commented Image component implementation to maintain clean code.
- Remove line 4:
// import Image from "next/image"; - Remove lines 33-39: the commented Image component block
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Image component usage patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'import Image from "next/image"'
rg -A 5 '<Image\s+src='
Length of output: 1723
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the GetInTouch component to see if there are any image-related elements
cat frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/GetInTouch.tsx
# Check if there are any background image related styles or patterns
rg -l 'background.*image' frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/IntegrateSection/GetInTouch.tsx
Length of output: 1369
33-39: Revise the background image implementation before uncommenting
The commented Image implementation has several potential issues:
- Hardcoded dimensions (900x400) might not be responsive
- Absolute positioning with z-index could cause layout issues
- Missing loading and placeholder handling
Consider this approach when implementing:
<Image
src={integrateData.getInTouchSection.background.url}
alt="Get In Touch Image Background"
fill
sizes="100vw"
priority
className="object-cover -z-10"
placeholder="blur"
blurDataURL={integrateData.getInTouchSection.background.blurDataUrl}
/>Let's check for similar background image patterns in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Background image implementation pattern found in codebase
Looking at the search results, there are established patterns for background images in the codebase:
- In
frontend/src/components/home/Hero.tsxandfrontend/src/components/ForBuilders/Hero.tsx:className="absolute top-0 h-full object-cover object-left left-0 z-[-1]"
The suggested implementation aligns with the existing patterns in the codebase, but should be adjusted to match the established approach:
<Image
src={integrateData.getInTouchSection.background.url}
alt="Get In Touch Image Background"
className="absolute top-0 h-full object-cover left-0 z-[-1]"
width={1920} // Provide a reasonable max-width
height={1080} // Maintain aspect ratio
priority
/>🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for background image implementation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'Image $props className="$_"'
rg 'object-cover.*-z-\d+'
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to find Image components and background implementations
# Find Image imports and usage
rg -l "from ['\"]next/image['\"]"
# Search for Image components with background-related classes
rg "Image.*className.*(?:absolute|background|z-\[|z-\d)" -A 2
# Look for specific background image patterns
rg "object-cover|background-image|absolute.*z-"
# Find all Image component implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'Image src={$_} alt={$_}'
Length of output: 1428
frontend/src/queries/for-builders/integrate.tsx (2)
4-49: Add field validation and consider security implications
The query fetches multiple URLs (SVG, background, links) without any validation or sanitization strategy. This could lead to security vulnerabilities if the CMS content is compromised.
Let's check for any URL validation or sanitization in the codebase:
Consider implementing:
- URL validation helpers
- SVG sanitization for user-provided content
- Content Security Policy (CSP) headers
4-78: Verify GraphQL schema compatibility
Ensure that the query and type definitions match the GraphQL schema definition.
✅ Verification successful
GraphQL query matches schema structure
The GraphQL query in frontend/src/queries/for-builders/integrate.tsx correctly matches the backend schema structure:
- The
forBuildersPageIntegrateSectionmatches the CMS schema with correct fields (header, title, description) - The
appsSectionrelation correctly uses theAppsSectiontype from navbar which includes solutions and arrowLink - The
getInTouchSectioncomponent matches the "Get in Touch" component schema with header, button, and background - The
arrowLinkmatches the "ButtonLink" component schema with text and link fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GraphQL schema definitions
fd -e graphql -e gql schema
rg -t graphql "type forBuildersPageIntegrateSection"
Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for schema files with different extensions and patterns
fd "schema|\.graphql$|\.gql$"
# Search for type definition in any file
rg "type\s+forBuildersPageIntegrateSection"
# Search for GraphQL type definitions in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg "type\s+forBuildersPageIntegrateSection" -t ts -t js -t tsx -t jsx
# Look for any schema-related files in common GraphQL directories
fd . -p "graphql|schema"
Length of output: 1704
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the schema for the integrate section
cat cms-backend/src/api/for-builders-page-integrate-section/content-types/for-builders-page-integrate-section/schema.json
# Also check for any references to AppsSection type since it's used in the query
rg "AppsSection" -t ts -t js
Length of output: 2420
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the navbar query to understand the AppsSection type structure
cat frontend/src/queries/navbar.tsx
# Also check the get-in-touch-section component schema
fd "get-in-touch-section" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 2378
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the button-link component schema since it's used in both arrowLink and getInTouchSection
fd "button-link" --exec cat {}
# Also check if there are any other components that might be relevant
fd -t d "components" -d 2
Length of output: 358
frontend/src/styles/globals.css (1)
68-72: LGTM! Base class setup is correct.
The positioning and z-index setup provides a proper foundation for the gradient border effect.
frontend/src/queries/for-builders/use-cases.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and necessary for the GraphQL query definition.
3-97: Verify GraphQL query and TypeScript type alignment
Let's ensure the GraphQL query structure perfectly matches the TypeScript type definition.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the type safety by checking the actual usage in components.
GraphQL query and TypeScript type definition are correctly aligned
After analyzing the usage across components, all field accesses match the defined TypeScript type structure perfectly. The components correctly access:
- Scalar fields: sectionHeader, useCaseTitle, useCaseDescription
- Nested objects: useCaseBanner.url, arrowLink.link.url
- Array fields: useCases.map(), solutionSections.partners.map()
- Complex nested structures: solutionSections.solution with all its fields
No type mismatches or undefined field accesses were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any GraphQL queries in the codebase that use this type
# to verify consistent usage
# Look for GraphQL queries using forBuildersPageUseCasesSection
rg -t typescript "forBuildersPageUseCasesSection" --type-add "typescript:*.{ts,tsx}"
# Look for components using UseCasesQueryType
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = UseCasesQueryType'
Length of output: 1716
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check how the UseCasesQueryType is used in components and verify field access
rg -A 3 "useCasesData\." frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/
# Check if there are any TypeScript errors or type mismatches in the components
ast-grep --pattern 'useCasesData.$_' frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/
Length of output: 9838
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx (1)
13-15: LGTM! Well-typed interface.
The interface is properly typed with the GraphQL query type and follows TypeScript naming conventions.
frontend/src/pages/for-builders.tsx (3)
1-17: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper typing.
The imports are logically grouped (utilities, components, and queries) and properly typed with their respective query types.
45-65: Previous review comment about error handling and data fetching optimization is still applicable.
67-67: LGTM! Proper default export.
The export follows Next.js page conventions.
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/Header.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rc/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rc/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection.tsx/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/index.tsx (1)
16-18: Avoid prop spreading for better maintainabilityUsing the spread operator (
{...{ useCasesData }}) makes it harder to track prop dependencies. Consider passing props explicitly:- <Header {...{ useCasesData }} /> - <KeyChallenges {...{ useCasesData }} /> - <LearnMore {...{ useCasesData }} /> + <Header useCasesData={useCasesData} /> + <KeyChallenges useCasesData={useCasesData} /> + <LearnMore useCasesData={useCasesData} />frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx (1)
5-7: Consider adding prop validationThe interface could benefit from more specific typing for the nested data structure:
interface IHeader { - useCasesData: UseCasesQueryType["forBuildersPageUseCasesSection"]; + useCasesData: { + keyChallenges: { + title: string; + description: string; + }; + }; }frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/Header.tsx (1)
20-25: Enhance image configuration for better performance and accessibilityThe Image component configuration could be improved in several ways:
- Add a
loading="lazy"attribute for better performance- Use a more descriptive alt text that includes the use case context
- Consider making dimensions responsive using relative units or layout fill
<Image src={useCasesData.useCaseBanner.url} - alt="UseCaseBanner mobile" + alt={`${useCasesData.useCaseTitle} banner image`} width="400" height="835" + loading="lazy" />frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx (1)
9-11: Consider moving hover effect styles to a shared utilityThe hover effect styles could be reused across components and should be moved to a shared utility file.
Consider creating a shared styles utility file and importing the hover effect from there.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/Header.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/LearnMore.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/index.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/index.tsx
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/index.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/Header.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/Header.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frontend/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/LearnMore.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nd/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...nd/src/components/ForBuilders/UseCasesSection/DAOSection/KeyChallenges/HowKlerosSolvesIt.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
todo:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Herocomponent for enhanced page structure.ForBuilderspage component integrating multiple sections.IntegrateSectionandUseCasesSectioncomponents for better content organization.Bug Fixes
AppsDropdownContentcomponent.