Add new 'Implements' analyzer for interface implementation lookup #2028
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These analyzers show all members implementing the analyzed member, not the members of implemented interfaces
The analyzer can be used on any non-static members of classes and structs. The analyzer shows a new 'Implements' node for those members that implement an interface (implicitly or explicitly). Abstract members are considered as implementation. Overridden virtual members of base classes are not considered.
|
Thank you very much for your contribution! LGTM |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #1998
A new analyzer for the interface implementation lookup. The analyzer can be used on any non-
staticmembers of classes and structs. The analyzer shows a newImplementsnode for those members that implement an interface (implicitly or explicitly). Abstract members are considered as implementation. Overridden virtual members of base classes are not considered.I also added the Moq library into the
ILSpy.Teststest project. If you'd like to use another mocking library, let me know - I'll change that.