Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New resource: azurerm_express_route_port #10074

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 2, 2021

Conversation

magodo
Copy link
Collaborator

@magodo magodo commented Jan 7, 2021

New resource: azurerm_express_route_port

Reference

Test Result

💤 make testacc TEST=./azurerm/internal/services/network/tests TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
==> Checking that Custom Timeouts are used...
==> Checking that acceptance test packages are used...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./azurerm/internal/services/network/tests -v -run=TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_ -timeout 180m -ldflags="-X=github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_complete
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_complete
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_update
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_update
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_requiresImport
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_userAssignedIdentity
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_userAssignedIdentity
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_update
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_complete
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_userAssignedIdentity
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_basic (166.46s)
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_requiresImport (177.45s)
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_userAssignedIdentity (189.52s)
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_complete (227.78s)
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMExpressRoutePort_update (289.52s)
PASS
ok      github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/internal/services/network/tests       289.569s

Cost

This resource takes a high cost on creation. Please refer to its pricing page for details.

@magodo magodo changed the title New resource: azurerm_express_route_port WIP: New resource: azurerm_express_route_port Jan 8, 2021
@magodo magodo force-pushed the express_route_port branch from c38f266 to a2ae0d9 Compare February 25, 2021 13:09
@magodo magodo changed the title WIP: New resource: azurerm_express_route_port New resource: azurerm_express_route_port Feb 25, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from a few minor comments about schema this looks good @magodo

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.54.0 milestone Mar 30, 2021
@magodo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

magodo commented Mar 31, 2021

@katbyte Thank you for the review comments! I've resolved some of them and leaving the others for your further inputs. Please take another look :)

@katbyte katbyte modified the milestones: v2.54.0, v2.55.0 Apr 2, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @magodo aside from one comment this LGTM 👍

@katbyte katbyte merged commit d3ac587 into hashicorp:master Apr 2, 2021
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 9, 2021

This has been released in version 2.55.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.55.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 2, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 2, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants