-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUGFIX beta] allow watching of ES5+ Getter #12491
Merged
stefanpenner
merged 6 commits into
emberjs:master
from
stefanpenner:fix-es5-watched-getter
Jan 21, 2016
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
076e05a
[BUGFIX Release] allow watching of ES5+ Getter
stefanpenner a0d7dec
[BUGFIX beta] unwatch should not destroy foreign descriptor
stefanpenner aed80aa
[BUGFIX beta] Ember.set should not smash ES5 descriptor
stefanpenner 68d262a
[BUGFIX beta] remove redundant code (already the default M getter)
stefanpenner 1f8c70b
[BUGFIX beta] MandatorySetter: Restore properties correctly
stefanpenner 4e052ff
[BUGFIX beta] MandatorySetter should work with inheritance.
stefanpenner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to me (just off the bat) that we need to do the same thing as was added in #12314 to lookup the getter through the entire prototype chain. As it exists here, I believe that a getter from a parent class will not be found.
Specifically, I think we should use lookupDescriptor, and add some tests around this behavior like these ones only for getter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so, this exists to simulate the behavior if no descriptor existed at this level. It aims to re-target get one step up the prototype chain.
In-case i mis-understood, here are the relevant tests (which may explain better when this aims to do then I can), -> Related tests->: https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/pull/12491/files#diff-25946da80206a01a2f680ad806bb1780R370
Let me know if im not crazy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait i believe i see it now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
adding another test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a test, will investigate another time (time for bed)