You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 8, 2023. It is now read-only.
It looks like a hash map is used to configure the storage aggregation rules and sorted before creating the storage-aggregation.conf. This means the alphabetical order of the aggregation rule names needs to match the order in which the rules should appear in the .conf file in order for the 'first matching rule is used' principle to work correctly.
By contrast, the storage schema rules are configured using a list which means that the order in which the storage schema rules are written in the puppet .pp file will be preserved in the storage-schemas.conf file that is created.
Using a list to configure the rules seems more intuitive and less likely to result in unintentional reordering of the rules. Is it possible to change the way the storage-aggregation rules are configured to use a list instead of a hash map?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Because the default is first, and matches everything (notice the wildcard regex), all metrics will use it. This means all the metrics used average as aggregation type (even the counts/max/min etc.).
It looks like a hash map is used to configure the storage aggregation rules and sorted before creating the storage-aggregation.conf. This means the alphabetical order of the aggregation rule names needs to match the order in which the rules should appear in the .conf file in order for the 'first matching rule is used' principle to work correctly.
By contrast, the storage schema rules are configured using a list which means that the order in which the storage schema rules are written in the puppet .pp file will be preserved in the storage-schemas.conf file that is created.
Using a list to configure the rules seems more intuitive and less likely to result in unintentional reordering of the rules. Is it possible to change the way the storage-aggregation rules are configured to use a list instead of a hash map?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: