Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scaladoc corrections and improvements #119

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 5, 2014
Merged

Scaladoc corrections and improvements #119

merged 10 commits into from
Oct 5, 2014

Conversation

dwhjames
Copy link
Owner

  • Correcting bad links to and out of date documentation that has carried over from previous versions.
  • Adding new and improving exisiting documentation.

dwhjames and others added 9 commits December 16, 2013 11:05
Conflicts:
	macros/src/main/scala/datomisca/query.scala
Correct compile error:

    [error] datomisca/macros/src/main/scala/datomisca/macros/ExtraMacros.scala:35: macro implementation has incompatible shape:
    [error]  required: (c: scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context)(str: c.Expr[String]): c.Expr[clojure.lang.Keyword]
    [error]  or      : (c: scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context)(str: c.Tree): c.Tree
    [error]  found   : (c: scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context)(q: c.Expr[String]): c.Expr[clojure.lang.Keyword]
    [error] parameter names differ: str != q
    [error]   def KW(str: String): Keyword = macro MacroImpl.KWImpl
    [error]                                                  ^
    [error] one error found
tidy up links to v0.6 types
@GitsMcGee
Copy link
Contributor

Pretty cool. I learned a few new things, just by reading the diff :)

dwhjames added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2014
Scaladoc corrections and improvements
@dwhjames dwhjames merged commit 23ee7fc into dwhjames:develop Oct 5, 2014
@dwhjames dwhjames deleted the topic/tidy-up branch October 5, 2014 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants