Add --packages-above-depth selection mechanism
#22
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cottsay
added
enhancement
dirk-thomas
reviewed
Mar 15, 2019
This package selection argument selects the given packages and packages which depend on them, proceeding out to the given depth. Passing a depth of `0` yields the same behavior as `--packages-select`, while passign a sufficiently large value yeilds the same behavior as `--packages-above`.
dirk-thomas
reviewed
Mar 18, 2019
cottsay
commented
Mar 18, 2019
|
Thanks for the improvement. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This package selection argument selects the given packages and packages which depend on them, proceeding out to the given depth.
Passing a depth of
0yields the same behavior as--packages-select, while passign a sufficiently large value yeilds the same behavior as--packages-above.Requires colcon/colcon-core#172
Inspired by ros-infrastructure/ros_buildfarm#590 (comment)