Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #1575

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Update README.md #1575

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

cloutiertyler
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Changes

This pull request includes updates to the README.md file to clarify the status of various language SDKs and modules for SpacetimeDB. The most important changes include updating the status of the TypeScript and Python SDKs and modules from "coming soon" to "planned."

Updates to SDK and module status:

  • README.md: Changed the status of TypeScript and Python modules from "coming soon" to "planned."
  • README.md: Changed the status of the Python SDK from a link to "planned."

Signed-off-by: Tyler Cloutier <[email protected]>
@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler requested a review from bfops August 7, 2024 15:03
Copy link
Collaborator

@bfops bfops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent 🙌

@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ You can write SpacetimeDB modules in a bunch of popular languages, with many mor
- [Rust](https://spacetimedb.com/docs/sdks/rust/quickstart)
- [C#](https://spacetimedb.com/docs/sdks/c-sharp/quickstart)
- [Typescript](https://spacetimedb.com/docs/sdks/typescript/quickstart)
- [Python](https://spacetimedb.com/docs/sdks/python/quickstart)
- Python (planned)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch.. I wonder what I searched for / why I missed this..

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you correctly made the change to the docs, but it's also listed here.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh yeah this is a different repo 🙃

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler enabled auto-merge August 7, 2024 15:09
@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit d6a215d Aug 7, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants