Skip to content

Make the passkeys prerequisites explicit besides linking to docs #966

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

Widcket
Copy link
Contributor

@Widcket Widcket commented May 30, 2025

  • All new/changed/fixed functionality is covered by tests (or N/A)
  • I have added documentation for all new/changed functionality (or N/A)

📋 Changes

The documentation in EXAMPLES.md for all passkey-related operations (login, signup, enrollment) currently links to a docs page that contains the end-to-end instructions for setting up passkeys for an Auth0 application, including all the prerequisites.

For the sake of clarity, this PR explicitly lists those same prerequisites before deferring to the docs page.

Also, some minor formatting changes were made in the API docs for the MyAccount protocol.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
@Widcket Widcket requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2025 12:01
@Widcket Widcket added documentation This adds, fixes or improves documentation review:small Small review labels May 30, 2025

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
@Widcket Widcket merged commit 9ea20af into master May 30, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@Widcket Widcket deleted the docs/passkeys-prerequisites branch May 30, 2025 13:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation This adds, fixes or improves documentation review:small Small review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants