Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[syntax-errors] Tuple unpacking in
return
andyield
before Python 3.8 #16485[syntax-errors] Tuple unpacking in
return
andyield
before Python 3.8 #16485Changes from all commits
914d0a6
f2aa25a
99a866e
0d93a56
67dd41c
c5485dc
7987697
d2b68f7
bc240ef
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add test cases using single unpack element like
return *rest
oryield *rest
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about
yield 1, (*rest)
,yield 1, (yield 2, *rest), 3
(yield can be used as an expression)? I'm just throwing out random examples :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for these! The single cases are actually still invalid on my system Python (3.13):
But these aren't flagged as
ParseError
s by ruff.The second case is very interesting. It's actually accepted on both 3.7 and 3.8, but not on my 3.13 system Python (
SyntaxError: cannot use starred expression here
). That might be another change not currently tracked in #6591.I added your third case as an example of a yield expression and moved the check into
parse_yield_expression
as @MichaReiser suggested.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's because the grammar says it's allowed.
I think it's caught by the CPython compiler and not the parser. You can see that
python -m ast test.py
wouldn't raise a syntax error here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, missed the issue #16520