Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix crash while removing values from maps containing complex types #2225

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

bzawisto
Copy link
Contributor

It happened when there was a map containing maps as values, e.g map<string, map<string, ...>>. It triggered the assertion and led to node crash.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 24, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branch2215-transaction-processing-issue
Testbedself-hosted
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
full-blocks-erc20-transfers/full-blocks-erc20-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,093.70
(-19.50%)
1,831.48
(59.72%)
full-blocks-evm-transfers/full-blocks-evm-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
451.52
(-24.20%)
740.43
(60.98%)
full-blocks-zil-transfers/full-blocks-zil-transfers📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,141.30
(-1.19%)
5,354.84
(77.34%)
process-empty/process-empty📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.34
(+14.78%)
10.54
(98.09%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Copy link
Contributor

@JamesHinshelwood JamesHinshelwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks. Only 2 small comments.

Co-authored-by: James Hinshelwood <[email protected]>
@JamesHinshelwood JamesHinshelwood added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 973eb30 Feb 4, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@JamesHinshelwood JamesHinshelwood deleted the 2215-transaction-processing-issue branch February 4, 2025 11:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Transaction processing issue because the transaction is already present in the mempool
2 participants