827 popover block test

[Mezzet]

Description

Adding Popover block tests

Changes Made

Added popover test file

How to Test

Create mock data
Run tests

Notes

[github-actions]

@CodiumAI-Agent /describe

[CodiumAI-Agent]

Title

827 popover block test

---

User description

Description

Adding Popover block tests

Changes Made

Added popover test file

How to Test

Create mock data
Run tests

Notes

---

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Add unit tests for PopoverBlock

• Verify popover opens on click trigger

• Check default placeholder content

• Ensure styled popover applies custom styles

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	Popover.spec.tsx Add unit tests for PopoverBlock                                                    libs/renderer/src/testing/block-defaults/Popover.spec.tsx Create mock block definitions for popover scenarios Render ContainerBlock as popover target Test default popover open and placeholder text Validate styled popover dimensions and content +182/-0
Additional files	pnpm-lock.yaml [link]

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[github-actions]

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[github-actions]

@CodiumAI-Agent /improve

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Isolated render The test’s click target is obtained from a separate render of ContainerBlock in beforeEach and not part of the PopoverBlock render under test. As a result, fireEvent.click on that target will not open the popover instance being rendered in each individual test. Consider rendering ContainerBlock and PopoverBlock together or querying the correct element within the same render scope. fireEvent.click(target); Style assertion The tests mix object-style and string-style assertions and include spaces in the rgb value, which may cause false negatives. Standardize to one assertion style (e.g., object with exact values) and ensure the rgb formatting matches the actual computed style. expect(element).toHaveStyle({ width: "200px", height: "100px" }); expect(element).toHaveStyle("backgroundColor: rgb(108, 71, 71)"); expect(element).toHaveStyle("border: 1px solid #000000");

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Render popover with its container Render the popover inside the container block so the click target exists in the same DOM tree and query it from the same container. This ensures the click actually triggers the popover open logic. libs/renderer/src/testing/block-defaults/Popover.spec.tsx [142-151] -const { container } = render(<PopoverBlock id="popover" />, { +const { container } = render(<ContainerBlock id="target-container" />, { blocks: { - popover: { - ...blocks["popover"], + "target-container": { + ...blocks["target-container"], + slots: { + children: { children: ["popover"], name: "children" } + } }, + popover: { ...blocks["popover"] } }, }); -// click to trigger popover +const target = container.querySelector("[data-block='target-container']"); fireEvent.click(target); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The test currently renders the PopoverBlock separately from the container, causing the click on target to not be in the same DOM; wrapping in ContainerBlock fixes the click trigger context and corrects the test.	High
	Render styled popover inside container Include the styled popover within the same container rendering so the click target is present, and query it from the returned container. This aligns the DOM contexts for trigger and popover. libs/renderer/src/testing/block-defaults/Popover.spec.tsx [160-171] -const { container } = render(<PopoverBlock id="styledPopover" />, { +const { container } = render(<ContainerBlock id="target-container" />, { blocks: { - styledPopover: { - ...blocks["styledPopover"], + "target-container": { + ...blocks["target-container"], + slots: { + children: { children: ["styledPopover"], name: "children" } + } }, - helloText: { - ...blocks["helloText"], - }, + styledPopover: { ...blocks["styledPopover"] }, + helloText: { ...blocks["helloText"] } }, }); +const target = container.querySelector("[data-block='target-container']"); fireEvent.click(target); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: Similar to the first test, the styled popover is rendered outside its container, so including it in the ContainerBlock ensures the click correctly triggers popover display.	High

[memisrose]

The tests pass here, but there are errors.