Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Takeoff vs init race in SITL #12264

Closed
julianoes opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Takeoff vs init race in SITL #12264

julianoes opened this issue Jun 14, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Sim: SITL software in the loop simulation

Comments

@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor

Sometimes when I'm to eager to do commander takeoff and not everything is initialized as it should I can get into the state where the takeoff is not executed properly.

INFO  [ecl/EKF] EKF aligned, (pressure height, IMU buf: 22, OBS buf: 14)

pxh> 
pxh> commander takeoff
ERROR [commander] rejecting takeoff, no position lock yet. Please retry..
Command 'commander' failed, returned 1.
pxh> INFO  [ecl/EKF] EKF GPS checks passed (WGS-84 origin set)
pxh> commander takeoff
ERROR [commander] rejecting takeoff, no position lock yet. Please retry..
Command 'commander' failed, returned 1.
pxh> INFO  [ecl/EKF] EKF commencing GPS fusion
pxh> commander takeoff
ERROR [commander] rejecting takeoff, no position lock yet. Please retry..
Command 'commander' failed, returned 1.
pxh> commander takeoff
pxh> WARN  [navigator] Already higher than takeoff altitude
INFO  [logger] closed logfile, bytes written: 1644561

https://logs.px4.io/plot_app?log=86eed90e-0e5c-41a7-bd3a-47daf256458c
@julianoes julianoes added bug Sim: SITL software in the loop simulation labels Jun 14, 2019
@julianoes julianoes self-assigned this Jun 14, 2019
@weekly-digest weekly-digest bot mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2019
Closed
@PX4 PX4 deleted a comment from stale bot Sep 17, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the Admin: Wont fix label Sep 17, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 16, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 16, 2019
@bresch bresch removed the stale label Mar 19, 2020
@bresch bresch mentioned this issue Mar 19, 2020
Closed
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 17, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 17, 2020
@julianoes julianoes removed their assignment Nov 16, 2020
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Nov 16, 2020
@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Haven't seen this in a long time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Sim: SITL software in the loop simulation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@julianoes @bresch