Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10.0][ENH] crm_claim #178

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 11, 2017
Merged

[10.0][ENH] crm_claim #178

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 11, 2017

Conversation

bodedra
Copy link
Member

@bodedra bodedra commented Oct 1, 2017

Would you please review following points:

  1. remove _rec_name = 'name' from crm.claim.stage object.

  2. Visible Teams in stage form view which will help to setup default team.

  3. Add OCA logo.

@yajo yajo added this to the 10.0 milestone Oct 2, 2017
Copy link
Member

@chienandalu chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why all the code style change?

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

And not only that, you should make a PR to our branch, not a full new PR. Closing this.

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza closed this Oct 2, 2017
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Sorry, the module was merged and it was incorrectly closed. I reopen, but please, don't make any stylistic change (that it's also against OCA guidelines).

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza reopened this Oct 2, 2017
from . import (
models,
report,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, delete this change, because I have some scripts that runs over __init__ files and I don't want to change them just because you want to use this kind of notation that nobody uses.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although I agree on not changing this to reduce diff, not sure what scripts do you have but those are wrong indeed, this is perfectly valid Python.

crm_claim_category,
crm_claim_stage,
res_partner,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete change

from . import crm_claim_report
from . import (
crm_claim_report,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete change

from . import test_crm_claim
from . import (
test_crm_claim,
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delete change

Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please as said by others, we should try to keep changes to minimal.

If anything violates a linter rule, then change it, but otherwise it's better to leave it as it was, so we can review directly the important change (BTW, I can't distinguish if your pull request is actually adding something between all the cosmetic changes).

Besides, if you add a description to the PR, it also becomes easier to know what are we reviewers supposed to review.

Thanks!

from . import (
models,
report,
)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although I agree on not changing this to reduce diff, not sure what scripts do you have but those are wrong indeed, this is perfectly valid Python.

@bodedra
Copy link
Member Author

bodedra commented Oct 9, 2017

I have revert back my changes.

Would you please review following points:

  1. remove _rec_name = 'name' from crm.claim.stage object.

  2. Visible Teams in stage form view which will help to setup default team.

  3. Add OCA logo.

Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yikes, still broken runbot. Code seems OK now (note: squash at merge)

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza merged commit f2b80dd into OCA:10.0 Oct 11, 2017
bodedra pushed a commit to ursais/crm that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2017
cristinamartinrod pushed a commit to Tecnativa/crm that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
manuelcalerosolis pushed a commit to Tecnativa/crm that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2020
manuelcalerosolis pushed a commit to Tecnativa/crm that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2020
flachica pushed a commit to flachica/crm that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2020
flachica pushed a commit to flachica/crm that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2020
manuelcalerosolis pushed a commit to Tecnativa/crm that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
redapureskill pushed a commit to redapureskill/crm that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2020
Daniel-CA pushed a commit to Daniel-CA/crm that referenced this pull request May 13, 2021
bizzappdev pushed a commit to bizzappdev/crm that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2022
FernandoRomera pushed a commit to MallorcaSoft/crm that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2022
jdidderen-nsi pushed a commit to jdidderen-nsi/crm that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
BernatObrador pushed a commit to APSL/crm that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants