Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement Malt.InProcessWorker #39

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2023
Merged

Implement Malt.InProcessWorker #39

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2023

Conversation

Pangoraw
Copy link
Member

@Pangoraw Pangoraw commented Feb 23, 2023 •
edited by fonsp
Loading

this worker just runs in the same process.

Fixes #27.

@Pangoraw
Implement Malt.InProcessWorker
a512d30 
this worker just runs in the same process.

Fixes #27.

> **Note**
> This targets the branch for PR #32.
@Pangoraw Pangoraw marked this pull request as draft February 23, 2023 17:25
@fonsp
Copy link
Member

fonsp commented Mar 7, 2023

Maybe we can also implement Malt.DistributedStdlibWorker that just translates our API to Distributed API, to make supporting both backends in Pluto a bit easier?

@fonsp fonsp linked an issue Mar 7, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Add option to create a "same-process worker" #27
Closed
Base automatically changed from reuse-connection to main March 13, 2023 17:06
@fonsp fonsp marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2023 18:01
@Pangoraw Pangoraw merged commit 41f59ef into main Mar 15, 2023
@Pangoraw Pangoraw deleted the in_process_worker branch March 15, 2023 07:58
@fonsp fonsp mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add option to create a "same-process worker"
2 participants
@Pangoraw @fonsp