Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clang-tidy: port over ImplicitAtomicsChecker #42510

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021
Merged

clang-tidy: port over ImplicitAtomicsChecker #42510

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

vtjnash
Copy link
Member

@vtjnash vtjnash commented Oct 5, 2021

More correct to be a clang-tidy pass as we get better coverage. But requires
upstream support for loading clang-tidy pass plugins (not in clang v13): https://reviews.llvm.org/D111100

@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Oct 6, 2021
More correct to be a clang-tidy pass as we get better coverage. But requires
upstream support for loading clang-tidy pass plugins (not in clang v13).
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 0c21173 into master Oct 7, 2021
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the jn/clang-tidy branch October 7, 2021 15:22
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Oct 7, 2021
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
More correct to be a clang-tidy pass as we get better coverage. But requires
upstream support for loading clang-tidy pass plugins (not in clang v13).
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
More correct to be a clang-tidy pass as we get better coverage. But requires
upstream support for loading clang-tidy pass plugins (not in clang v13).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants