Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make lock file inside cache directory #1382

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaavee315
Copy link
Contributor

@kaavee315 kaavee315 commented Mar 1, 2025

Important

Update LOCKFILE_PATH in constants.py to be inside LOCAL_CACHE_DIRECTORY.

  • Behavior:
    • Update LOCKFILE_PATH in constants.py to be inside LOCAL_CACHE_DIRECTORY instead of the current directory.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 2f37987. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@kaavee315 kaavee315 requested a review from angrybayblade as a code owner March 1, 2025 17:04
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
composio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 1, 2025 5:04pm

Copy link
Contributor

LGTM 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 2f37987 in 24 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/constants.py:136
  • Draft comment:
    Good change placing the lock file in the cache directory. Ensure that LOCAL_CACHE_DIRECTORY is valid and writable during runtime.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
2. python/composio/constants.py:136
  • Draft comment:
    Good change. Confirm that placing the lock file inside LOCAL_CACHE_DIRECTORY aligns with design requirements.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50%
    None
3. python/composio/constants.py:144
  • Draft comment:
    Typo: In the comment for VERSION_LATEST_BASE, consider replacing 'Latest none-breaking version specifier.' with 'Latest non-breaking version specifier.' to correct the typographical error.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_evnCfhUNjRwUAjeA


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
Name of the pusher cluster.
"""

LOCKFILE_PATH = Path("./.composio.lock")
LOCKFILE_PATH = LOCAL_CACHE_DIRECTORY / ".composio.lock"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a migration step to handle existing lock files in the old location. Users upgrading might have stale lock files in their working directories that should be cleaned up.

@shreysingla11
Copy link
Collaborator

Code Review Summary

The change to move the lock file to the cache directory is a good improvement in terms of file organization and system cleanliness. The modification is minimal and uses proper Path operations.

Positive Aspects:
✅ Centralizes Composio files in the cache directory
✅ Uses existing directory with proper permission checks
✅ Prevents lock file pollution in working directories

Suggestions:

  • Consider adding migration code for cleaning up old lock files
  • Update documentation to reflect the new lock file location
  • Add a note in the changelog about this location change

Overall, this is a good improvement to the codebase. The change is safe as the cache directory already has proper error handling and permission checks in place.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants