Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix validate assets for updated task in quality evaluationresult assets #3928

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

guptha23
Copy link
Contributor

Fix validate assets for updated task in quality evaluationresult assets

@guptha23 guptha23 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2025 06:24
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Test Results for assets-test

0 tests   0 ✅  0s ⏱️
0 suites  0 💤
0 files    0 ❌

Results for commit 2255d11.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Test Results for scripts-test

79 tests   79 ✅  8m 27s ⏱️
 1 suites   0 💤
 1 files     0 ❌

Results for commit 2255d11.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

ShipraJain01
ShipraJain01 previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2025
vizhur
vizhur previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2025
@guptha23 guptha23 added the safe to publish Pull request containing new asset has been tested properly label Mar 11, 2025
@vizhur vizhur added safe to publish Pull request containing new asset has been tested properly and removed safe to publish Pull request containing new asset has been tested properly labels Mar 11, 2025
@guptha23 guptha23 merged commit 1cc72a8 into main Mar 11, 2025
55 of 56 checks passed
@guptha23 guptha23 deleted the caravapalli/update_quality_asset_tags_validation branch March 11, 2025 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe to publish Pull request containing new asset has been tested properly
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants