Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add 0.5.0 ChangeLog #1414

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2018
Merged

Conversation

HusterWan
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Michael Wan [email protected]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

doc: add changelog for release 0.5.0

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how you did it

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 24, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1414 into master will decrease coverage by 22.54%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1414       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   38.77%   16.23%   -22.55%     
===========================================
  Files         250      200       -50     
  Lines       16630    13583     -3047     
===========================================
- Hits         6449     2205     -4244     
- Misses       9355    11223     +1868     
+ Partials      826      155      -671
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/httputils/http_error.go 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
pkg/httputils/http_utils.go 0% <0%> (-100%) ⬇️
apis/server/router.go 0% <0%> (-91.18%) ⬇️
daemon/containerio/hijack_conn.go 2.85% <0%> (-85.72%) ⬇️
ctrd/image.go 0% <0%> (-85.28%) ⬇️
daemon/mgr/container_monitor.go 0% <0%> (-85.19%) ⬇️
apis/server/volume_bridge.go 0% <0%> (-84.82%) ⬇️
daemon/mgr/spec_annotations.go 0% <0%> (-82.36%) ⬇️
apis/server/container_bridge.go 0% <0%> (-82.33%) ⬇️
daemon/mgr/volume.go 0% <0%> (-81.38%) ⬇️
... and 111 more

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -1,5 +1,158 @@
# CHANGELOG

## 0.5.0 (2018-05-25)

**IMPORTANT**: In Pouch 0.5.0 we have done many things that important to all users of Pouch:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use PouchContainer here, since it is the brand we use now. If the part below has the same issue, please correct them as well. Thanks a lot.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

roger !

CHANGELOG.md Outdated

1. PouchContainer now supports CRI v1alpha2 that will support for Kubernetes 1.10.0
2. Add plugin mechanism that we can use many existing volume and network plugins
3. Add many container and image tools like `logs` and `tags` command that will be very helpful for daily container operation
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/tags/tag

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
* Add `debug` flag to pouch client [\#1234](https://github.com/alibaba/pouch/pull/1234) ([shaloulcy](https://github.com/shaloulcy))
* Fix `exec` command align with Moby `v1.24` API [\#1226](https://github.com/alibaba/pouch/pull/1226) ([fuweid](https://github.com/fuweid))
* Fix volume info of `inspect` output is incompatible with Moby API [\#1213](https://github.com/alibaba/pouch/pull/1213) ([HusterWan](https://github.com/HusterWan))
* Refact network list api, make it compatible with Mody API [\#1173](https://github.com/alibaba/pouch/pull/1173) ([rudyfly](https://github.com/rudyfly))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/refactor/refact

Signed-off-by: Michael Wan <[email protected]>
@fuweid
Copy link
Contributor

fuweid commented May 25, 2018

LGTM

@HusterWan HusterWan merged commit c320db1 into AliyunContainerService:master May 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants