-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOCS] Enhance the UX when restoring postgres db #216
Conversation
Feel free to directly close this PR if this is going to be fully addressed by the new |
To me it seems a bit too low level for end users FAQ. It's nice that a developer can do that, but for end users we already have |
I see your point, and it's totally legit. But we're already explaining how to restore the dashboards using advanced commands like dropping volumes... Why not continuing improving the user experience in that direction? Would it be better if we move this advanced commands deeper in the docs? Or what if we let |
I agree with @carlosms that it would be better to show how-tos using Regarding this specific use-case, maybe we could provide a |
Prune and init would not satisfy the same usecase, because it does not keep repos, metada nor indexes. From my pov, we should consider if the usecase is legit: if it is, try to improve the current experience, or provide a better way; if it is not alegit usecase, drop it from the docs. Maybe @src-d/product could confirm if restoring the UI state is a feature that we want to provide. |
These commands are needed only for development. |
Moving it to |
8bb0064
to
c5fb71e
Compare
Moved into |
c5fb71e
to
18900d9
Compare
'sourced restart' is slower than just waking up the new DB container,g and loading the dashboards Signed-off-by: David Pordomingo <[email protected]>
18900d9
to
b2c0d56
Compare
sourced restart
is slower than just waking up the new DB container, and loading the dashboards.(especially when developing, when the user might be interested in keeping the current container)