Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blazegraph status #46

Closed
zacharywhitley opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed

Blazegraph status #46

zacharywhitley opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@zacharywhitley
Copy link
Contributor

Blazegraph was acquired by Amazon and it's current status is unknown. There haven't been any commits to the repo in a couple of years.

@maximveksler
Copy link
Contributor

I know of companies that are still using it, as well as open source projects (Wikidata).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15809687

Let's add a note about the fact it's not being maintained ?

I'm also curies as to what Wikidata are planning.

@maximveksler
Copy link
Contributor

I'm becoming more convicnece that BlazeGraph is dead.

How about we created warning signs?

Databases

$ - Proprietary
OS - OpenSource
F - Free

@zacharywhitley
Copy link
Contributor Author

haha. Love it. Maybe we should change OS => SOS - Abandonware.

They haven't responded to any posts since they were acquired by Amazon and there was a specific question about the future of the project.

@maximveksler
Copy link
Contributor

haha "SOS software" 👍

I think we need to consider perhaps a plan for "in flux" as this being an evolving field. Apache has the concept of incubator where a project needs to form a community and useful code base before it is adapted as an Apache project.

I think that as we are a service for the community we now need to take responsibility for the inventory of this repo, work to define a "precise" value that is to be gained by using the list, and then work for optimising reaching that goal.

I.e. it's not just an inventory list, it's a list that claims to be the "best option possible", and if one or several projects fall out of these criticise, i.e.

  1. No one uses it (yet? ever?)
  2. Looks Abandonware (use judgment, you know it when you see it. Hasn't been maintained? No issues reported? documentation is broken / non existing? googling for it doesn't bring any users / results, and co..)
  3. Is colliding with much better solutions listed.
  4. Blazegraph case (widely used, very popular, has been purchased out of existence)
  5. Something else? (doesn't feel right...)

Then we should decide how we're handling it, we can choose to remote it. If it's very very valuable then keep it by mark it as Abandonware. or maybe push it down to some other "graveyard list"

@zacharywhitley
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like there is some discussion about having an opensource version managed by the people at wikidata blazegraph/database#86

@zacharywhitley
Copy link
Contributor Author

There seems to be some activity on this subject. Blazegraph is a significant code base and is deployed at Amazon so I'm going to close this. We can reopen it if something changes.

@maximveksler maximveksler changed the title Blasegraph status Blazegraph status Feb 2, 2019
@maximveksler
Copy link
Contributor

I think we have an action item here:

If we see community momentum is building behind a fork, we should early to help by redirection our references to the new repo. Reason being that Blazegraph codebase as it is is suffering from digital rot, without security patches and co.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants