From 18d51bec36642c6d696532b9a6e14827f37cc626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stan Ulbrych <89152624+StanFromIreland@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 02:34:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gh-127833: lexical analysis: Add backticks to BOM example
 (GH-132407) (cherry picked from commit
 0552ce0fb24d33b51fdd02a589ede95aabc0d8b5)

Co-authored-by: Stan Ulbrych <89152624+StanFromIreland@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst b/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst
index ff801a7d4fc494..b8453946362867 100644
--- a/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst
+++ b/Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ which is recognized by Bram Moolenaar's VIM.
 
 If no encoding declaration is found, the default encoding is UTF-8.  If the
 implicit or explicit encoding of a file is UTF-8, an initial UTF-8 byte-order
-mark (b'\xef\xbb\xbf') is ignored rather than being a syntax error.
+mark (``b'\xef\xbb\xbf'``) is ignored rather than being a syntax error.
 
 If an encoding is declared, the encoding name must be recognized by Python
 (see :ref:`standard-encodings`). The