Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate setup code in storage proxy #3932

Open
HyeockJinKim opened this issue Mar 10, 2025 — with Lablup-Issue-Syncer · 0 comments
Open

Separate setup code in storage proxy #3932

HyeockJinKim opened this issue Mar 10, 2025 — with Lablup-Issue-Syncer · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@HyeockJinKim
Copy link
Collaborator

HyeockJinKim commented Mar 10, 2025

User story

  • As a developer, when I am working on the storage proxy, I want to separate the setup code using aiohttp into the setup package so that I can maintain a cleaner codebase.
  • As a developer, when I implement the setup package, I want it to have the same interface for setup so that it can be easily integrated.
  • As a developer, when I need to verify the setup, I want to develop a CLI so that I can confirm the setup process works correctly.
  • As a developer, when I have the setup values, I want to replace the existing code to run the server so that the application functions as intended.

Context

The issue involves separating the setup code currently in the storage proxy into a dedicated setup package. This will help streamline the code and ensure that the setup process can be verified through a command-line interface (CLI).

Acceptance criteria

  • The setup code in the storage proxy must be separated and moved to the setup package.
  • The setup package should maintain the same interface for setup operations.
  • A CLI must be developed to verify the setup process.
  • The existing code must be replaced to allow the server to run using the setup values received.

Other information

N/A

@HyeockJinKim HyeockJinKim self-assigned this Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant