Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support complicated multi-value importances #670

Open
MicahGale opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Support complicated multi-value importances #670

MicahGale opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
feature request An issue that improves the user interface.

Comments

@MicahGale
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I just found according to section 4.5 of 6.3.1 manual this is valid: imp:n,p,e 1 1 0 which is equivalent to imp:n,p=1 imp:e=0.
@MicahGale MicahGale added the feature request An issue that improves the user interface. label Feb 28, 2025
@MicahGale
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Relevant to #106.

@tjlaboss
Copy link
Collaborator

MCNP 6.3.1 Manual § 4.5

Image

@MicahGale
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the manual screenshot. That's what I was referring to. I'm now a bit unclear on if how I have interpreted imp:n,p=1 is correct and is valid syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature request An issue that improves the user interface.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@MicahGale @tjlaboss