Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension(s): Crop Classification #12

Open
m-mohr opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Extension(s): Crop Classification #12

m-mohr opened this issue Aug 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

m-mohr commented Aug 13, 2024

@ivorbosloper wrote:

There are many crop classification systems, but there is not one to rule them all. The right classification system is the one that fits your purpose. Biologists use a taxonomy. Retailers look at how products end up on the shelf. Many European open datasets use a code list that fits the specific implementation of the CAP policy in a member state for a specific year. Earth Observation crop classes are designed so they can identified with high accuracy.

There are some international lists with authority (there’s probably more)

I think the best approach for harmonising data sets is to 1) always keep the original coding system of the source data in place, and then 2) add additional, more generic classifications.

The HCAT system works well for CAP-based open data sets. It seems like a good candidate, but to make it a standard it should be embedded in some institution, with change management procedures and version control. I’m not aware how well that’s organised currently.

And then again, within the fiboa standardisation system you don’t have to decide on a ‘single final’ classification. But for distributing harmonised data sets, it would be useful to pick a useful candidate. It’s quite some work transforming data sets.

@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor Author

m-mohr commented Aug 30, 2024

Discussion points from yesterday:

  • HCAT seems pretty good, especially as it is a hierarchy and thus allows different granularity. Should ideally be extended to worldwide, but it‘s a lot of work which seems out of scope for fiboa. Should we write a blog post around extending HCAT? Maybe get in touch with HCAT authors?
  • Maybe we could map between HCAT / EPPO / FAO? They have different usecases though.
  • Generally it seems not very fruitful to just create extensions without a dataset that implements it directly, so we may just wait for others to build extensions

@cholmes cholmes changed the title Extension(s): Crop Cover Extension(s): Crop Classification Oct 10, 2024
@m-mohr m-mohr moved this to Backlog in fiboa Nov 19, 2024
@m-mohr m-mohr added this to fiboa Nov 19, 2024
@m-mohr m-mohr moved this from Backlog to Review in fiboa Nov 20, 2024
@ivorbosloper
Copy link

We now have the crop extension that solves this issue. We've changed most of the converters to adopt this extension. If convert & publish the datasets again, the datasets will automatically implement this extension.

@ivorbosloper
Copy link

Additionally, I still would go for the HCAT extension as a generic coding scheme. Adopt HCAT, include some more crops outside of Europe in HCAT, and add it to every relevant dataset....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants