We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is analogous to importing foo.bar.* in Java.
foo.bar.*
The file is currently named _package.dart and there are currently a few problems with it.
_package.dart
_package
import 'foo/bar/_package.dart'
import 'foo/_package.dart'
Some thoughts:
*.dart
foo/bar
bar.dart
bar
Bar
-.dart
+.dart
cc @dcharkes @liamappelbe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, I pondered this question when we first started this project. And, I still don't know a good solution. 🙃
Sorry, something went wrong.
Is this a configurable option? Making it a config option is an easy work around. Then it doesn't matter so much what the default is.
Sure. We could make it configurable as well.
No branches or pull requests
This is analogous to importing
foo.bar.*
in Java.The file is currently named
_package.dart
and there are currently a few problems with it._package
could technically exist.import 'foo/bar/_package.dart'
but notimport 'foo/_package.dart'
, we should generate this at each level._package.dart
, especially starting with an underscore is the file to look for.Some thoughts:
*.dart
is not supported in Windows so that's not possiblefoo/bar
is calledbar.dart
, but a classbar
orBar
could exist which clashes with this name.-.dart
or anything that has a dash in it since it won't clash with a class name+.dart
or anything with a plus – Maybe this looks the most like import everything?cc @dcharkes @liamappelbe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: